Monster 28-pound trout caught in north Idaho was a rainbow

2013-09-16T15:13:00Z Monster 28-pound trout caught in north Idaho was a rainbowBy Eric Barker - Lewiston Tribune
September 16, 2013 3:13 pm  • 

LEWISTON, Idaho - A monster trout caught below Dworshak Dam in July has been deemed a rainbow following DNA analysis.

That makes the 28-pound, 9-ounce fish the largest rainbow trout legally caught in Idaho. However, Tui Moliga of Lapwai won't land his name in the state record books for the fish.

Moliga, a member of the Nez Perce Tribe, caught the fish below Dworshak Dam at a time the river wasn't open under state rules to harvest of rainbow trout longer than 20 inches. But the area was open under tribal rules.

After he caught the fish, Idaho Department of Fish and Game officials faced a pair of dilemmas regarding his request to have it considered as a state record. First, they were unsure if the fish was a true rainbow trout, or Kamloops rainbow trout. Kamloops have their own category in the state record book. The existing rainbow record is 20 pounds, 2 ounces, while the kamloops record tops 37 pounds.

Second, they were unsure if Moliga could qualify for the book since he harvested a fish that would not have been available for non-tribal members to keep. The second dilemma was quickly settled when Fish and Game officials, in consultation with the Idaho Attorney General's Office, determined record book rules imply all candidate fish must have been caught in compliance with existing state of Idaho fishing rules.

The first dilemma took some lab work to untangle. Joe DuPont, regional fisheries manager for Fish and Game at Lewiston, said Moliga's catch tested out as belonging to the Trout Lodge strain of rainbows that is marketed as a variety of Kamloops. However, the state's geneticist found members of the Trout Lodge strain are more closely aligned with native coastal rainbow trout then they are with the Gerrard Strain of Kamloops from the Kootenai Lake Drainage in British Columbia, Canada.

"We would probably consider that fish a rainbow," DuPont said. "If it was in an area you could keep those fish, it would have likely qualified for a state record."

Moliga previously said it would be nice to have his name in the book but he isn't upset by the decision. He feels the same way even after learning the fish is a rainbow and the difference between state and tribal rules is all that is keeping him out.

"It's not a big deal to me. Like I said before, it doesn't change the fact that I was able to catch a real big trout," he said.

DuPont said state fisheries officials are taking a look at the record book rules and asking themselves if there should be different categories for rainbow trout, Kamloops and steelhead.

"Does it really make sense to have Kamloops, steelhead and rainbow records? They are all rainbows and it is not always clear what strain they are," he said. "Maybe in the future we will have just one rainbow record."


Barker may be contacted at or at (208) 848-2273. Follow him on Twitter @ezebarker.

Copyright 2015 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian ( may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick