U.S. Rep. Steve Daines, R-Mont., got two amendments attached to legislation intended to speed up timber harvests on national forest land during a House committee session on Wednesday.

One amendment to the Restoring Healthy Forests for Healthy Communities Act requires that the U.S. Forest Service give priority to forests bordering Indian reservations in need of hazardous fuels reduction, in accordance with the Tribal Forest Protection Act of 2004.

In a news release, Daines said the agency has failed to follow the earlier legislation, which has put tribal lands at risk from wildfires starting on adjacent national forests.

The second would give the Forest Service more authority to deny appeals of projects it uses under its categorical exclusion rule. Categorical exclusions are intended for small-scale or repetitive actions that shouldn’t need full-scale agency analysis before approval.

“Without this provision, decisions on important, low-impact projects conducted by the Forest Service which were once completed in five to 10 days will continue to be delayed by at least 30 days, and in some cases, up to 145 days,” Daines said.

The bill passed the House Natural Resources Committee on Wednesday and is now headed for a vote before the full House of Representatives.

“As a fifth-generation Montanan, I know too well how devastating wildfires and the mismanagement of our national forests can be to our communities, our state’s economy and the health of our forests,” Daines wrote. “This bill will help create thousands of long-term jobs, protect our environment for future generations, allow tribes, local counties and states to have more input in forest management, and renew the federal government’s commitment to our rural counties.”

Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Wash., authored the Restoring Healthy Forests for Healthy Communities Act (H.R. 1526). Daines is one of 18 co-sponsors. The bill would require the Forest Service to produce at least half the sustainable yield of timber each year and share 25 percent of its revenues with local county governments. It would also streamline National Environmental Policy Act and Endangered Species Act analyses of projects.

In Montana, money coming through the now-expired Secure Rural Schools funding from timber sales totaled $22 million in 2011. That included $1.8 million to Flathead County, $5 million to Lincoln County and $1 million to Mineral County.

“While much of our forests are suitable for harvesting, we still face community-threatening wildfires each summer and almost 10 percent unemployment in Ravalli County,” Ravalli County Commissioner Greg Chilcott said of Daines’ amendments in an email. “There is much that can be done to better manage our forests, create jobs, and protect our communities from wildfires while assuring local governments have resources they need to best serve the public.”

Reporter Rob Chaney can be reached at 523-5382 or at rchaney@missoulian.com.

More from missoulian.com

(2) comments

jus wundrin
jus wundrin

This is how the gubment creates jobs: by cutting red tape. This bill will create many good paying jobs, and help restore the middle class at the cost of nearly nothing by the gubment.

Matthew Koehler

Remember when Missoulian opinion columnist wrote a piece titled, "Tester's Forest Jobs Bill Plus Daines Bad for Conservation? If not, give it a re-read:


Well, here we are a few months later and the environmental "collaborators" supporting Senator Tester's mandated logging bill, the Forest Jobs and Recreation Act, have been heavily courting Rep Steve Daines to introduce Tester's bill in the House. People may have noticed that the Montana Wilderness Association has been actively getting their members to submit glowing LTE's about how great Steve Daines is and how he should join Sen Tester and Sen Baucus to support mandated logging of national forests in Montana. In fact, this website was recently launched by MWA: http://bringthemtogether.org/bring-them-together.

Well, today's article, "Daines makes additions to U.S. House bill to speed timber harvests" gives people in Montana (especially those who value Wilderness and public lands) an indication of 1) just where Steve Daines wants to take national forest policy; and 2) just how irresponsible and naive the "collaborators" at the Montana Wilderness Association are if they think Steve Daines will be their big Wilderness and public lands protection champion.

According to The Wilderness Society, which also ironically supports Senator Tester's mandated logging bill, the ironically titled, "Restoring Healthy Forests for Healthy Communities Act" would establish “Forest Reserve Revenue Areas” as a replacement for the current Secure Rural Schools (SRS) county payments program, simultaneously creating a legally-binding logging mandate with no environmental or fiscal feasibility limits, and reestablishing the discredited 25% logging revenue sharing system that was eliminated over a decade ago with the creation of SRS.

Furthermore, under Rep Daines bill, public participation and Endangered Species Act protections would be severely limited. The bill creates huge loopholes in NEPA and such biased ESA requirements that in practice these laws would almost never meaningfully apply. For example, any project less than 10,000 acres (that's 15.6 square miles) would be categorically excluded from environmental analysis and public participation, and the Forest Service would be required to submit a finding that endangered species are not jeopardized by any project, regardless of its actual effect on the species.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.