Frenchtown mill redevelopment official looks to changes amid challenge

2013-02-12T06:00:00Z 2014-03-15T15:35:23Z Frenchtown mill redevelopment official looks to changes amid challengeBy Rob Chaney of the Missoulian

M2Green Redevelopment manager Ray Stillwell hopes to see big changes at the former Smurfit-Stone Container Corp. mill site by the end of the year, despite its potential designation as a federal Superfund cleanup project.

“We have things that could easily happen in 2013,” Stillwell said Monday during a visit to the Missoulian. “A Superfund designation adds an element of marketing challenge. It creates a perception there’s a problem with moving forward. But we believe the Denver EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) office is supportive of getting the education out there so prospective renters or buyers can come on site and not be responsible for environmental conditions.”

As part of a weeklong marketing and support-building effort in Missoula, Stillwell said he’ll be meeting with government officials, business leaders and community members connected with the mill site to explain the possibilities. It has been renamed the Frenchtown Technology and Industrial Center, and about three-quarters of the papermaking machinery at the mill has been demolished and sold for parts or scrap.

That leaves a 3,000-acre property with 1 million square feet of warehouses, machine shops, offices and other infrastructure. The site has rail and truck loading facilities, 70 megawatts of electrical service, industrial-scale natural gas supply and rights to 25 million gallons of water a day. It also has two permitted gravel pits and one class 3 landfill, along with a yard capable of handling a million tons of wood per year.


The challenge comes from recent investigations that found high levels of toxic chemicals on 138 acres, mainly in cooling ponds and other landfills. Missoula City-County Environmental Health Supervisor Peter Nielsen said that’s about the size of the University of Montana campus, and most of it sits in the Clark Fork River floodplain.

However, Missoula County wants to see those areas separated from the rest of the site to improve M2Green’s chances of getting business going there, Nielsen said.

“That’s very doable,” Nielsen said. “It’s been done in many other places. The county wants to work with them so they can be successful.”

Gov. Brian Schweitzer officially notified the EPA in December that the mill site needed to be placed on the federal National Priority List for cleanup. That decision could be made in April, after which the agency would detail the required cleanup.

Stillwell said the Frenchtown site was the only one of six Smurfit-Stone mills his company has bought for redevelopment that’s reached this point of federal oversight, although all the others have had cleanup issues. Although he told Missoula County officials last fall M2Green wanted to pursue a private cleanup path, he did not indicate any plans to fight the Superfund designation.

“We don’t have adverse goals,” Stillwell said. “We do environmental work, too. This is a very formalized approach, and unfortunately that takes more time.”

The site could host a variety of separate or cooperative ventures, Stillwell said. One M2Green facility in Canada is working on mining its landfills, which contain a mix of old paper waste, for biofuel and fly ash that can be refined for metals.

“We’d like to see things where one company’s off-take or byproduct might be feedstock for a neighbor,” he said. “We’re very serious about marketing this as broadly as we can.”

That includes international outreach for industries such as the oil-and-gas equipment fabricators for the Bakken and Alberta energy fields, chemical production, woody biomass refining and other emerging technology markets.

“We think this community is a great one to build on,” Stillwell said. “We see Missoula as a friendly environment.”

Reporter Kim Briggeman can be reached at (406) 523-5266 or by email at

Copyright 2015 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(2) Comments

  1. hellgatenights
    Report Abuse
    hellgatenights - February 12, 2013 1:03 pm
    Meanwhile......Mayor Pork Chop is no where to be found, and Jobs Czar Grunke is MIA as well. When the fog clears.......we see that you have to produce a profitable product to sustain a business. These business model vanished long ago for Smurfit in the Missoula Valley, and M2Green knows this. That is why they have plans to market the best asset, the water.
  2. Sukey
    Report Abuse
    Sukey - February 12, 2013 3:35 am
    As a rule of thumb, no reputable bank will give you a commercial loan within 2 miles of a hazard dump waste site. Separating out 132 acres and pretending toxic waste in a floodplain doesn't exist or is not "part" of this probable superfund site isn't going to impress a bank. Downstream liability, for those with big pockets- like the lenders who financed a project- is huge. According to the law its "joint and several" and they do go after you. Then you have multiple government agencies squeezing you, every dime you have, for years. Its insulting to label a hazardous waste site, that can make people very ill, a "technology center". I'd be willing to bet the farmer that bought some of the land bought it for water rights, not to try and grow crops in toxic soil.
Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian ( may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick