HELENA – Gov. Steve Bullock plans to reopen limited negotiations for a water-rights compact with the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes.

State officials said Tuesday they need to revisit a water-use agreement between the tribes and irrigation districts on the Flathead Reservation. It would be incorporated into the larger compact and be presented to the 2015 Montana Legislature.

Tribal leaders have agreed to reopen negotiations solely for that purpose.

A handful of lawsuits are pending in the dispute over who controls water flowing on or through the reservation and how much goes to farmers, ranchers and others through the Flathead Indian Irrigation Project.

The Democratic governor said the water-use negotiations should be based on factors that motivated the initial negotiations, “namely that that irrigation deliveries will be protected and that water saved through upgrades and repairs to the Flathead Indian Irrigation Project will be allocated to tribal instream flows.”

The water-use agreement was an appendix to the water-rights compact, which the 2013 Legislature rejected. The group that negotiated the water-use agreement on behalf of three irrigation districts then disbanded, effectively invalidating it.

Four lawsuits over claims to the water have since been filed.

Talks will take place this summer. State officials said they plan to move fast so they can reach an agreement and give information to legislators well before the 2015 session.

About a dozen members of the public commented both for and against the governor’s plan Tuesday during an interim legislative water policy committee meeting.

Phil Mitchell of Flathead County said the governor’s letter inviting negotiations leaves too many unanswered questions.

“Please do this right for all parties,” he said. “I don’t think you’re there yet.”

The 2015 session is the final chance for lawmakers to approve the compact. If they fail, the tribes will have to assert their water rights by filing claims in a state stream adjudication court by June 30, 2015, the governor’s letter said.

Salish and Kootenai attorney Rhonda Swaney said Tuesday that the tribes want to get the water-use agreement into the compact and that they prefer negotiation to court action.

More from missoulian.com

(9) comments

Pistol

Is Bullock the governor? Or is he still Attorney General? He got involved in Beach. Had an opinion on German exchange student's death. Now this!

Ofthemontiers
Ofthemontiers

Okay, I shall try to control my temper here. Your ignorance should not determine my blood pressure.

That being said, what the heck do you mean "Now this?"

Dubs

Oh gosh, I wonder who will have the advantage when the governor get involved. Lets see, liberal governor versus ranchers and farmers, this may be easy to predict.

Ofthemontiers
Ofthemontiers

Why is this "versus ranchers and farmers?" The compact guarantees water rights, it doesn't take them away

dickm

ARTICLE I COMPACT WITH THE UNITED STATES
All provisions of the enabling act of Congress (approved February 22, 1889, 25 Stat. 676), as amended and of Ordinance No. 1, appended to the Constitution of the state of Montana and approved February 22, 1889, including the agreement and declaration that all lands owned or held by any Indian or Indian tribes shall remain under the absolute jurisdiction and control of the congress of the United States, continue in full force and effect until revoked by the consent of the United States and the people of Montana.
Congress has absolute jurisdiction over control of tribes. Where does Governor Bullock get the authority to negotiate away Montana's water rights with the tribe?

Readneck

The existence of many ranches on the reservation is the result of a violation of a treaty.

Ofthemontiers
Ofthemontiers

Exactly, Readneck. The Tribes never asked for allotment & homesteading.

Ofthemontiers
Ofthemontiers

Congress has exclusive authority to "regulate commerce" with Indian tribes (U.S. Constitution, Article I, Sect 8, third clause). This does not amount to "absolute jurisdiction."

"Negotiate away Montana's water rights?" Much of Montana's water is already under federal appropriation, and that which isn't is "public use" per the Constitution of Montana, Article IX, Section 3(2). Furthermore, the legislature is obligated to "provide for" the use of "cultural resources" which is what appropriated tribal water is: Article IX, Section 4.

Ofthemontiers
Ofthemontiers

Go ahead. Anybody. Say something.

Step up, son.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.