ST. IGNATIUS – Even while voting is ongoing, a complaint filed last week with the Montana Commissioner of Political Practices is asking that the election results be voided if specific candidates win seats on the Flathead Joint Board of Control.

Alan Mikkelsen of St. Ignatius says a group that opposes a proposed water rights compact for the Flathead Indian Reservation, and an accompanying proposed water use agreement between the board and the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes, violated multiple Montana campaign laws when it distributed materials supporting two candidates and advocating for the defeat of their opponents.

Mikkelsen’s complaint says the campaign letter was distributed by the Western Montana Water Users Association on April 18, the same day ballots were mailed to irrigators.

That in itself violates Montana Code Annotated, Mikkelson says, by being mailed during an ongoing election by mail ballot.

The letter, Mikkelsen charges in his complaint, makes false accusations against FJBC chairman Walt Schock, who is up for re-election, and the Cooperative Management Entity of the Flathead Indian Irrigation Project.

It is a prohibited contribution from a corporation, he alleges, and violated another law because no fair warning was given of the mailing before an ongoing election.

“WMWUA is not registered as a political committee, nor has it filed any election reports as such a committee, listing donors and donor amounts,” Mikkelsen writes in his complaint. “That in itself may be in violation of MCA 13-37-210, Naming of Committees. Under MCA 13-37-225, there has been no report of contributions and expenditures. At the very least, WMWUA is in violation of MCA 13-37-217, contributions in the name of an undisclosed principal. Without disclosure, WMWUA may also be in violation of MCA13-37-216, limitations on contributions.”

***

The letter, which Mikkelsen attached to his complaint, is headlined “Important information: Your water rights are at stake” and addresses seven points.

Within its four pages, the Western Montana Water Users Association claims that Schock receives most of the benefits of a tribal pipeline project “yet only paid part of the bill,” and says board member Steve Hughes “holds numerous tribal grazing leases and his livestock herds have grown substantially in only a few years.”

Both men, the letter says, “have consistently supported the CSKT’s proposed compact and FIP agreement” and “must be voted off the board.”

“FIP” refers to the Flathead Indian Irrigation Project.

Hughes holds the board’s only appointed seat. Four of the other 11 seats are currently up for election, with two of them contested. The letter urges irrigators to vote for Schock’s opponent, Jerry Laskody, in the Mission District, and for Shane Orien over Susan Lake in the Flathead District.

Schock and Lake both support the complex and controversial compact, which was negotiated between the state, the federal government and the tribes over the past decade. The compact, which depended on the separate water use agreement, stalled in the Montana Legislature this year.

Proponents say it was negotiated in good faith, protects current water uses, will avoid years, if not decades, of costly litigation and is the best possible solution. Opponents say it gives the tribes too much control over water in western Montana and will create insurmountable problems for non-Indian irrigators on the reservation.

Mikkelsen is a former consultant for the Flathead Joint Board of Control, and is also an irrigator on the reservation.

Election ballots are due back to the Lake County Elections Office by May 7.

Reporter Vince Devlin can be reached at 1-800-366-7186 or by email at vdevlin@missoulian.com.

(7) comments

missionblue
missionblue

The repercussions of buying back land shall be neigh. Though many will be complaining about it now, it will pay off later. The only disappointment is that the Tribes have to buy their land back in the first place. The above article resonates of an impending implosion. Continue folks.

LoneSomePolecat
LoneSomePolecat

Alan Mickelson, an ersatz lawyer according to some publications, seems to be acting as a lawyer, though un-licensed, and credited as a consultant? Oh, the irony, for one such to be claiming illegalities. Give him credit though, when you are about to lose, scream foul. Someone may listen. When you have had you way for so long, the withdrawal is daunting, and often results in tantrums such as we see here. Christoher Chavasse, Ronan

DVanVorous
DVanVorous

The die isn't cast yet...only in litigation.


As fer me, while a res resident I'm not an irrigator. Given the vitriol associated with the whole topic of water I see nothing in the cards but long term litigation and a loss in court on the part of the folks fighting the compact. The question is one of which side has enough $ to support a protracted court battle when the decision has already been made at a higher level than MT courts...

fomerliberal
fomerliberal

Mikkelson is an irrigator??? From what a neghbor tells me, he only owns like one acre. Does that qualkify him to say he is an irrigator??

jimira
jimira

This very vocal minority is spreading lies against the Tribe and their own... I find it amusing they are feeding on their own.

fomerliberal
fomerliberal

I see the CSKT tribal members are 'feeding on their own" also. Guess you are amused by that also?? The Peoples Voice has brought to the attention of Tribal Members, the shenanigans of the CSKT Tribal Council. The tribal council is being asked a lot of tough questions by CSKT members about how money is spent on the reservation. Like why is the tribe spending millions to buy land instead of using the money for the benefit of tribal members. The Peoples Voice is standing up to the Tribal Council and demanding their questions be answered.

jimira
jimira

Formerliberal, you should stick with another subject you have no clue. First, Tribal members feeding on their own has been happening since allotment. As for the Peoples Voice, they are not saying anything new. Most of the PV members are people who never claim their Tribal ancestry till money came available. The rest are Tribal members who messed up their own lives and want another hand out. Either way they do not speak for the majority. In addition, they are like the those who oppose the Compact, a small group with nothing but lies to spread. I bet there are a few members in both groups. The PV is a disgraceful sham which will accomplish nothing... The fact that you support them just adds to the evidence they DO NOT have the Tribal members best interest at heart... As for spending millions to buy back land. How does not owning all of OUR land not beneficial to the membership?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.