HAMILTON – State investigators have been called in to review evidence in an officer-involved shooting of a 47-year-old Hamilton man Thursday night.

The incident began with a 7:39 p.m. call to the Ravalli County Sheriff’s Office non-emergency number from a woman saying her son was having problems with his girlfriend at his residence, according to a Montana Department of Justice news release.

The 47-year-old man – whose name has yet to be released – called the same number at 8 p.m., asking that a deputy come to his residence at 808 Cuf Lane.

At 8:21 p.m., the man called 9-1-1 to continue to talk about problems he was having with his girlfriend, who was not present at his home at the time.

The deputy – a three-year veteran of the Ravalli County Sheriff’s Office – arrived at the man’s home just before 8:30 p.m.

The man allegedly became angry and agitated with the deputy after talking for several minutes, the news release said. He accused the deputy of not being a real law enforcement officer.

The man then walked toward a weapon that was visible in the room.

The deputy told him not to pick up the weapon, but the man allegedly disregarded those instructions and turned the weapon toward the law enforcement officer.

In response to the threat, the deputy fired and killed the man.

The man died on the scene.

The deputy has been placed on administrative leave pending an investigation into the incident in accordance with standard procedure.

Ravalli County Sheriff Chris Hoffman requested the Montana Department of Justice’s Division of Criminal Investigation take the lead in considering the facts that will be reviewed in a coroner’s inquest to be held in Ravalli County.

Powell County Coroner John Pohle will serve as coroner in the case. Once the state’s investigation is complete, the case file will be turned over to Pohle and the Ravalli County attorney for review.

Local law enforcement agencies routinely request that state officials investigate officer-involved shootings.

Editor Sherry Devlin can be reached at 523-5250 or at sdevlin@missoulian.com.

(26) comments

Lonnies wife
Lonnies wife

1. The antique gun was across the living room from where my husband was sitting while talking to the officer. It was in plain sight.

2. Not a domestic disturbance--I was not at home while any of this happened. I arrived at the house when they were wheeling my late husband into the ambulance...I had no idea anything had happened. There was no one else in the house...just him & an officer. Oh--and our pets.

3. No, he was not insane. He had pushed his body and mind beyond his endurance by working long hours and tried to make it back home from Alabama ASAP to be with me and his son before we left for Nashville on the next job. He also did not believe in suicide as an option--enough already!!!


Reason
Reason

Um...not for anything...but the article only says there was a "weapon" visible. It doesn't say it was a firearm. When they say he turned the weapon towards the officer, it's leading to believe that its a gun, but for all we know, it could have been a baseball bat, a crowbar or even a broken bottle... of course; it's likely to have been a gun, but its funny how they don't come out and say outright: "gun"....unless it wasn't.

Snowcrest
Snowcrest

Ok,
A 9-11 call to a domestic disturbance and we stand there and converse with an agitated individual while a visible firearm is in the room ?
That deputy, or everyone else in the room could have been just as easily been the fatality/fatalities.
Very unprofessional and dangerous.
This is a teaching moment for the RCSO

corruptMissoulian
corruptMissoulian

You have to be kidding, they are just as trained with their tasers as they are with their standard firearms. If the situation was escalating why didnt he have his taser already ready, i read they were talking for a few minutes..

Barkinlounger
Barkinlounger

Sounds like maybe somebody missed the class on deescalation techniques.

Phil_Walker
Phil_Walker

There aren't enough facts present to come to any conclusions or judgments yet. Let's let the investigation come to a conclusion and the Coroner's Inquest happen. This is a tragic situation for everyone involved including the Deputy who had to make the decision to use deadly force.

Tiger
Tiger

I wonder if a tazer would have been enough force? Hard to tell from the story, but it seems like the officer had more than enough time to try that first and still blow him away with his service piece if that didn't work.

WILD BILLY
WILD BILLY

A very sad and tragic incident,but this scenario JUST DONT ADD UP!!

in the pines
in the pines

Yeah but why aren't our cops trained to shoot to wound rather than to shoot to kill? I understand that maybe a shot in the leg or arm would leave the guy still alive and maybe still able to fire his gun but still seems to me the Deputy could have shot the guy's gun hand or are they not that good? Wonder what part of the body actually was hit ? Be interesting to hear the woman's other side of this story.

Fawzhuh
Fawzhuh

Gun hand is a pretty small target anytime, much less in a highly charged situation. Center mass, always center mass!

WILD BILLY
WILD BILLY

Center mass,yes,especially if you're training is substandard,or even standard. Spec.Ops., Secret Service,etc. know how to take somebody alive. Civilian law enforcement just don't have that type of "high-end training",and most probably do not care,unfortunately.


Fawzhuh
Fawzhuh

Its not a training issue but a safety issue (unless you are Jack Bauer on "24"). SWAT team members may receive disabling shot training as well as the groups you mentioned. The training has very limited uses in very specific circumstances. This situation was not one of those. The groups you mentioned, as well as virtually anyone who receives defensive firearms training, are taught in "immediate danger" situations... center mass.

WILD BILLY
WILD BILLY

I agree.

Bittersweet
Bittersweet

Ughhhhh. Are you familiar with handguns or any firearms for that matter? Shoot to "wound?" An officers job is to protect the public and while doing so they need to protect themselves. These are split second decisions that the officers life depends on.

It is likely a rare occasion an officer has time to take the chance of shooting at a smaller target (a hand/gun/leg) while their own life depends on getting it right the first time.

You likely watch too much tv or movies?

Run - A- Mook
Run - A- Mook

Only in the wild west movies.

Run - A- Mook
Run - A- Mook

@in the pines
As a retired Deputy Sheriff, when I was in the Sheriffs Academy, we were
taught to shoot at the largest part of the body. Your chances of hitting his
gun hand? You would be better off playing the Power Ball. As for as aiming
for the leg or arm, he will be able to shoot you, where you should have shot
him. When a cop firers his weapon, he shoots to kill.

Run - A- Mook
Run - A- Mook

before you jump on me, that's, (fires) not firers.

msonelson
msonelson

One thing for sure. When you're dead you don't get to tell your side of the story.

WILD BILLY
WILD BILLY

And we all know cops don't lie!

Run - A- Mook
Run - A- Mook

@W.B.

) You sound reasonable...Time to up your medication.

Run - A- Mook
Run - A- Mook

that should be "unreasonable"

Objective observer
Objective observer

More insults. Hey Run, you got anything to post on here but insults? Apparently not.

WILD BILLY
WILD BILLY

Hey Run, Good advice,thanks. You never know,somebody might throw popcorn at Me when I am at the MOVIE THEATER. Thanks again.

walter12
walter12

Either this person was actually insane to behave it that manner or it was a case of suicide by cop.

raptor53
raptor53

yes. if you can believe what you are reading here. bottom line is this, there are no witnesses and dead men tell no tales.

COMMON SENSE
COMMON SENSE

There are a couple of valuable lessons here. First off, if you call 911 and a man shows up a few minutes later dressed in a uniform with a badge and gun driving a car with a star on it, It's a safe bet that it's not the mail man. Secondly, if your gun is out of reach and you go for it, it's also a safe bet that the man with the badge can get to his first. They don't train those guys to take down 7-10 splits in a bowling alley, you know.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.