Supreme Court lifts Montana's ban on corporate campaign spending

2012-02-18T06:45:00Z 2012-03-27T19:52:11Z Supreme Court lifts Montana's ban on corporate campaign spendingBy CHARLES S. JOHNSON Missoulian State Bureau missoulian.com

HELENA - The U.S. Supreme Court late Friday temporarily stopped enforcement of a Montana Supreme Court ruling that restored the state's century-old ban on corporations making contributions to political campaigns.

The immediate effect of the decision - at least for now - is that for the first time in a century, corporations can spend unlimited amounts of money in independent expenses on state and local political races in Montana.

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. Kennedy granted the request by American Tradition Partnership and two other groups to block the Montana Supreme Court's Dec. 30 decision.

In its motion, American Tradition Partnership asked the court to issue the stay because Montana's June 5 primary elections make it "vital that planning begin now for independent expenditures before the election."

The Montana Supreme Court, in a 5-2 decision, overturned a lower court decision and reinstated the state's voter-passed, 1912 ban on independent spending by corporations in political campaigns.

State District Judge Jeffrey Sherlock of Helena had struck down the Montana ban as unconstitutional under the U.S. Supreme Court decision, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. The U.S. Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling overturned a federal prohibition on independent campaign spending by corporations and unions.

The Montana Supreme Court majority said Montana voters passed, by initiative, the Corrupt Practices Act in 1912 to combat the widespread political corruption in the state by the owners of copper mining companies, known as the Copper Kings. The court majority said they had carved out a legal exception to the Citizens United ruling.

Donald Ferguson, American Tradition Partnership executive director, and Doug Lair, its Montana volunteer coordinator, praised Kennedy's decision as "a win for everyone's First Amendment rights."

"Montana's political and media establishment are fighting American Tradition Partnership's grassroots volunteers because free speech threatens their monopoly on political speech in Montana," Ferguson and Lair said in a statement. "As a grassroots-founded, people-powered advocate for rational environmental policies and free speech we will continue to fight the corrupt and lawless political machine in Helena, as well as the anti-jobs radicals at the Sierra Club who want to kill pipelines and progress itself."

Montana Attorney General Steve Bullock, who argued on behalf of the state before the Montana Supreme Court, had this response to the Supreme Court order Friday:

"While I'm disappointed that for the first time in 100 years Montanans won't be able to rely on our corporate spending ban to safeguard the integrity of our elections, I am encouraged that the Supreme Court will give this careful consideration and I look forward to continuing to fight for Montana in defending our century-old law.

"For more than a century, anyone has been able to participate in Montana elections - even out-of-state corporate executives. All we required is that they used their own money, not that of their stockholders, and they disclosed who they are."

***

Kennedy ordered the Montana Supreme Court's Dec. 30 ruling put on hold until the U.S. Supreme Court receives in a timely way and acts on American Tradition Partnership's request to appeal the state Supreme Court ruling. That request is known as a petition for a writ of certiorari. It is not automatic that the Supreme Court must accept the request for an appeal.

"Should the petition for a writ of certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically," Kennedy wrote. "In the event the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the issuance of the mandate of this court."

Kennedy was the author of the majority opinion in the Citizens United decision.

U.S. Supreme Court Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer, both dissenters in the Citizens United case, joined Kennedy's order.

Ginsburg, with Breyer agreeing, wrote: "Montana's experience, and experience elsewhere since this court's decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ... , make it exceedingly difficult to maintain that independent expenditures by corporations ‘do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption.' "

She quoted from the Citizens United majority opinion: "A petition for certiorari will give the court an opportunity to consider whether, in light of the huge sums currently deployed to buy candidates' allegiance, Citizens United should continue to hold sway."

Ginsburg said because lower courts are bound to follow the U.S. Supreme Court's decisions until they are withdrawn or modified, she would vote to grant the stay.

Jonathan Motl, a Helena attorney who filed a friend-of-the-court brief before the Montana Supreme Court for Free Speech for People and some other groups defending the 1912 law, was encouraged by Friday's order.

"This could be good because if the Supreme Court denies cert, Montana's law is no longer stayed," he said. "However, if cert is granted, the Supreme Court will revisit and perhaps undo the damages caused by its earlier (Citizens United) decision," Motl said.

Motl said he believes Justice Kennedy wants to revisit the Citizens United case because he could have granted the stay without involving the court, but chose to do so.

American Tradition Partnership Inc. based in Washington, D.C., bills itself as "a no-compromise grassroots organization dedicated to fighting the radical environmentalist agenda." It previously was called Western Tradition Partnership.

Joining the group in the challenge to the Montana law were Champion Painting Inc. of Bozeman and Montana Shooting Sports Association Inc. of Missoula.

 

 

Copyright 2015 missoulian.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on Missoulian.com

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian (Missoulian.com) may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in Missoulian.com's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on missoulian.com.

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

The 4:06 – trending topics and hot headlines

Missoulian reporter Martin Kidston presents the latest news you need to know about today's headlines in abo…

The 4:06 – trending topics and hot headlines

The 4:06 – trending topics and hot headlines

Missoulian digital director Emily Foster presents the latest news you need to know about tod…

Press conference: Kirsten Pabst

Press conference: Kirsten Pabst

April 22 press conference with Kirsten Pabst at the Missoula County Courthouse

The 4:06 – trending topics and hot headlines

The 4:06 – trending topics and hot headlines

Missoulian digital director Emily Foster presents the latest news you need to know about tod…

The 4:06 – trending topics and hot headlines

The 4:06 – trending topics and hot headlines

Missoulian digital director Emily Foster presents the latest news you need to know about tod…

The 4:06 – trending topics and hot headlines

The 4:06 – trending topics and hot headlines

Missoulian digital director Emily Foster presents the latest news you need to know about tod…

The 4:06 – trending topics and hot headlines

The 4:06 – trending topics and hot headlines

Missoulian digital director Emily Foster presents the latest news you need to know about tod…

The 4:06 – trending topics and hot headlines

The 4:06 – trending topics and hot headlines

Missoulian digital director Emily Foster presents the latest news you need to know about tod…

The 4:06 – trending topics and hot headlines

The 4:06 – trending topics and hot headlines

Missoulian reporter Martin Kidston presents the latest news you need to know about today's h…

Les Schwab

loading...

Search our events calendar