All five candidates voters elected to the Missoula County Public Schools board on Tuesday were endorsed by the union representing district teachers and classified staff.

For Melanie Charlson, the support from voters speaks volumes.

“Early on, MEA-MFT made a clear decision to work toward electing candidates to the board who are interested in clear communication, transparency in board decision-making and who are folks who will ask tough questions with teachers, staff and administrators,” said Charlson, president of Missoula’s teachers union. “I think people heard that loud and clear.”

“We are also very pleased that the technology levies passed,” she said. “It was nearly a 50-50 split, and that let me know that we need to continue opening communications with the community.

“How the votes played out was a real eye-opener.”

Voters said yes to the MCPS elementary school technology levy by a 7,267 to 5,811 count, and yes to the high school levy 11,282 to 9,902.

That 2,000 voters walked their ballots into the election office or left them at an official dropoff location Tuesday, and another 2,100 voters mailed ballots that were received Tuesday is something Forward Montana feels it had a hand in.

“We feel like we made a real difference in this election, and that is really exciting,” said Kayje Booker, interim executive for the Forward Montana Foundation, a group that works to engage young people in politics.

“We did a pro-technology levy campaign this spring,” she said Wednesday. “We engaged 64 volunteers, knocked on 3,024 doors, and we ended up making 1,317 phone calls. And because we have a new high school program where we go into the schools and work with students, we had high school students coming out with us and telling people how important the technology levies are.”

On Sunday and Monday leading up to the election, Forward Montana went out canvassing, knocking on doors, making phone calls, intent on convincing voters to support the levies.

The voting, Booker said, “was super close and we were concerned right up until we got the final election numbers.”

All three of the incumbents who lost their school board seats Tuesday – Scott Bixler, Joe Toth and Drake Lemm – said they, too, were relieved that the technology levies passed.

“It’s a great thing for Missoula and a great thing for our kids,” Bixler said. “It’s what we need to keep our technology in place and updated on an appropriate schedule.”

“We really need the technology levy, and getting that passed was more important to me than my position on the board,” Lemm said.

All of the candidates said they wish the five new trustees – Michael Beers, Diane Lorenzen, Julie Tompkins, Rose Dickson and Ann Wake – the best of luck.

“I’ll miss being on the board and the work that we do and the people we work with,” Bixler said. “But the new board will move forward and all of the new trustees, I’m sure, will do a wonderful job.

“It will be a steep learning curve, however, and I know they don’t understand the time commitment it will take, because I don’t think any of us did when we came onto the board.

“When you have a passion for this work it does become all-consuming – and I will definitely miss it.”

The election results made it obvious that voters wanted a new perspective on the board, Toth said.

“Whether that had to do with the recent brouhaha over (MCPS superintendent) Dr. (Alex) Apostle’s raise, and sometimes people want a change for whatever reasons, it is clear the voters voted for change,” he said. “But I’m worried about some of our programs. I hope there is not a loss, no inertia with some of these programs so that they can continue moving forward.”

Lemm echoed Toth’s concerns, even though the two trustees often voted differently on board decisions.

Lemm said he wanted to stay on the board to help keep the International Baccalaureate program, the Health Sciences Academy and the language immersion curriculum moving forward.

“I’m discouraged because the board members who got voted off have been instrumental in these efforts,” Lemm said. “As a school district, we are trying to compete not just nationally, but internationally. We are behind in some curriculum areas, but have been making great strides in that area to improve things.”

“Most people do not realize what great strides this district has put forth in the last five years – it’s been huge,” he said. “We’ve become the leading district in the state and the envy of our state because of what we are doing, what our superintendent is doing, and most people don’t realize that.”

Reporter Betsy Cohen can be reached at 523-5253 or at

(4) comments


Thank you to all of the teachers, parents and community members who passed these levies. Thank you to Lesli Brassfield and the MCPS staff for their hard work to get information out to voters. The teachers are already benefiting from this improved technology in the classroom.


The union being behind this is ok other than all they care about is collecting dues in the long run. Most unions are a dinosaur now but it is better than letting administration have their salaries and perks etc. Why does no one complain about that? Well, actually alot of people here have complained about it but I am still skeptical of the unions. They really are out for their own good and fund raising. I want teachers to have job security and the tools they need, including a decent salary they can live on, to teach our children well and prepare them for the world. That is the real issue here and I hope the new board members, no matter who supported them, will remember that.


If the teachers union is pleased with the election results, then watch out.


“We’ve become the leading district in the state and the envy of our state because of what we are doing, what our superintendent is doing, and most people don’t realize that.”
Just because Alex says doesn't mean it is true. We have great schools, but so do other towns in Montana. Bozeman High School just won an award for being one of the best high schools in country, and they did it without IB or Academies. No schools in Missoula won this award(even though we are obviously the envy of the state).

Last year we one an award for the amount of AP classes we offer. IB and academies will definitely limit the amount of AP classes offered, and AP classes are accepted more for college credit and more popular than IB classes(and are a lot less expensive). I hope that the new board members ask tough questions about these programs, and get rid of them if they are not in the best interests of our students. A fancy name and PR campaign is no substitute for good teaching. If anything, the programs drain resources from things our district has done well.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.