UM, MSU students want regents to add sexual orientation protections

2012-11-20T07:20:00Z 2014-04-06T18:38:39Z UM, MSU students want regents to add sexual orientation protectionsBy MARTIN KIDSTON of the Missoulian
November 20, 2012 7:20 am  • 

Student groups from the state’s two flagship universities have asked the Montana Board of Regents to put safety ahead of politics by adding sexual orientation and gender identity to its nondiscrimination policy.

The board didn’t take action on the student-driven request during its November meeting in Missoula, although it’s expected to consider the proposal in the months ahead.

“This needs to be well vetted,” said state Commissioner of Higher Education Clayton Christian. “We need to look at it from a systemwide perspective.”

Student senate members from the University of Montana and Montana State University both addressed regents on the issue, as did members of the Lambda Alliance and several individuals, including one transgender woman.

They were united in urging regents to add sexual orientation and gender identity to Policy 703 – the Montana University System’s nondiscrimination regulation.

“It’s crucial the Montana University System progresses in drafting a policy to ensure every person feels safe and welcome on campus,” said Kiah Abbey, president of the MSU student senate. “It not only supports our priority of access, but also creates campuses that foster diversity of thought and experience.”

Abbey asked regents to create a task force that’s co-chaired by a student. Adding the student, she said, would help members of the task force understand the plight of the gay, lesbian, transgender, bisexual and queer community.

“I’ve always known that universities are places that challenge norms and foster new ways of thinking,” said UM student senator Topher Williams. “We need to make sure that students, faculty and staff are welcome on our campuses if want to continue our legacy of excellence.”

The push for a policy change found its spark in 2011 when a transgender MSU student realized the university had no private showers at the gym. She approached the MSU senate with her complaint, but the senate failed to act.

Frustrated, the woman followed with a letter to MSU Dean of Students Matt Caires, who took the issue back to the student senate. The group unanimously passed a resolution in September, urging regents to add sexual orientation, gender identity and preference to its nondiscrimination policy.

The student senate at UM followed with a resolution of its own, unifying the state’s two flagship institutions in their request to regents.

“I received a telephone call from MSU student senator Troy Duker, who informed me that (the regents’) policy doesn’t include protection for sexual orientation, gender identity or preference,” said Williams. “We both agreed that it should. Mr. Duker and myself worked closely to draft identical resolutions and passed them through our respective senates.”


Kevin McRae, associate commissioner with the Office of the Commissioner of Higher Education, said current regents policy is rooted in the statutory civil rights language for protected classes, which covers age, race, sex, religion and so on.

The language mirrors the nondiscrimination policies in place at UM and MSU. The campuses, however, have already taken the language one step further by adding sexual orientation.

“We have not updated our language in quite a while, and if the request was for the board to include sexual orientation in its policy, then we could probably do that pretty matter of factly,” said McRae. “It’s already been in the campuses’ policy for some time.”

While the policy at UM and MSU includes sexual orientation, it does not cover sexual identity. McRae said adding sexual identity to the regents’ policy would require more vetting.

“We certainly can see and understand the basic decency and respect that underlies or motivates this student government proposal,” McRae said. “But there are still some details that need to be communicated and some interests that need to be fleshed out.”

If sexual identity were added to the policy as a protected class, McRae said, the universities could be required to provide accommodations, such as separate showers and restrooms, for transgender students. It was something the vetting process would take a closer look at, along with any potential costs.

McRae added that while the UM and MSU student senates already have passed and submitted their resolution for a policy change, the regents have not received input from other student groups at other Montana University System campuses.

In the coming weeks, he said, student affairs officers – including the vice presidents for student affairs, provosts and deans, among other campus leaders – will be asked to look into the issue at their respected institution.

“They’ll give us guidance or feedback that could result in a proposal for a policy change,” McRae said. “If that were to happen, it could happen in March when the regents meet again in Helena. Procedurally, that’s how it works.”

Reporter Martin Kidston can be reached at 523-5260, or @martinkidston.

Copyright 2015 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(5) Comments

  1. Greta
    Report Abuse
    Greta - November 20, 2012 6:57 pm
    Don't our kids have more important things to worry about? Isn't there something that really matters in this world other than someone ele's sexual proclivities? How many transgender people attend the UM? Three or four?

  2. Been There
    Report Abuse
    Been There - November 20, 2012 4:11 pm
    Please be more careful in the description of a protected class. There was a term that made me extremely uncomfortable that apparently the Missoulian can print, but I cannot comment on. Hint: It is a pejorative term for an unknown class. I am an old disability advocate. At least, we could describe the population we were advocating for.
  3. Dub
    Report Abuse
    Dub - November 20, 2012 11:21 am
    Isn't already against the law to discriminate, abuse, harass, and beat up on homosexuals?? Are they just looking for more publicity for their cause---seriously, do we really need more policy's?
  4. walter12
    Report Abuse
    walter12 - November 20, 2012 7:24 am
    Why is it that today's college kids are obsessed with the homosexual agenda? What is it that places so much importance, in their minds, for and of the 5% of the population? No one really cares if someone is homosexual or not, if one would not push their agenda into our faces.

    By the way, Missoulian, what exactly is transgender. Why don't you give all of us a good explanation of that particular situation. It is a great euyphism.
  5. Been There
    Report Abuse
    Been There - November 20, 2012 6:36 am
    Although the student intentions are seen by them as a partial solution to the sexual abuse incidents on campus, much more work than just lip service needs to go into this, as well as thought as to whether these individuals really want to be identified. Sexual abuse, regardless of the victim's sexual orientation, should not be tolerated. Safety for ALL students needs to be considered.
Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian ( may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick