Common Core standards are just common sense

2013-09-17T08:15:00Z Common Core standards are just common senseGuest column by BOB MCCOY
September 17, 2013 8:15 am  • 

That our state is implementing Common Core standards in math and reading (Missoulian, Aug. 18) is cause for celebration. For too long, the national state of education has suffered as shown by the continued decline since 1963 of SAT scores for graduating high school seniors. Sure, the raw numbers look better – until one realizes that there have been two “re-centerings” (read: padding the average score), first in 1967 and then in 1995.

The last time the College Entrance Examination Board converted the new scores to the old raw score method for comparison was for the scholastic year ending in 1995. The inflated score for reading was 504, which would have been 428 had the padding not been added. For math, the numbers were 506 new versus 482 old.

Now, some want to prevent the government from “cramming artificial standards” down the collective throats of school districts, parents and – most importantly – students. Well, that would be amusing were the problem not so serious, considering that one of the prime roles of government is to provide for the general welfare of its citizens – and that includes education.

We are no longer a patchwork of school districts whose residents never move much beyond where they were born. The mobility of today’s society is absolutely stunning. Children can be born in one district, attend elementary school in another and graduate from high school in yet another. Further, once in the workforce, they may find employment in even another state, or multiple states, as they progress through their careers.

This, by itself, is a powerful argument for standardizing achievement levels across the entirety of our nation. To do otherwise would result in students that haven’t attained the Common Core learning objectives finding themselves at a distinct disadvantage once they seek meaningful employment.

Others will say that some schools do not perform as well as others and that is reason to avoid these common standards. How will maintaining lower standards really help students improve? The answer is not to keep the bar low by allowing school districts to opt out of Common Core. It is to hold those schools accountable for meeting Common Core objectives, forcing them to improve if necessary.

A few have expressed concern that the poor performance of students will be taken as a reflection of the skills of their teachers. That would be a travesty, for there are factors beyond the control of educators that exert great influence on how students perform. Two readily come to mind: home environment and student peer association. Even so, competent administrators recognize the teachers who are outstanding and those who are not.

We should not denigrate worthy undertakings because of occasional poor execution in the field – just improve whatever or whomever is responsible for unacceptable performance. And on that subject, we all must be aware of the temptation to cook the numbers.

I refer to the program with that rousing title Graduation Matters. A close associate of mine tutored at-risk and low-performing students for Missoula County Public Schools this summer. My friend was shocked to learn that students are allowed to retake tests as often as necessary – until they pass. One student had taken the same test 22 times. When this was mentioned to another teacher, the reaction was a cynical snort and a sarcastic, “Oh, didn’t you know: Graduation Matters,” meaning the graduation rate matters.

Standards imply a certain level of integrity, so if we abrogate learning objectives just to look better, we have corrupted the system and failed our students. That is not in anyone’s best interest. Regardless, we should demand more of our educational system.

Robert McCoy writes from just outside Lolo. He worked as a technology coordinator in a K-12 school district before teaching at a public community college and a private not-for-profit university.

Copyright 2015 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(4) Comments

  1. Atheist Educator
    Report Abuse
    Atheist Educator - September 19, 2013 8:09 am
    jus wundrin said "This is the progressives dream come true: an equally dumbed down society that will be easier to control. "


    Perhaps you'd like to explain then why it was the Texas Republican Party that had in plank in their platform this last election cycle that sought to outlaw the teaching of critical thinking skills in the public school?

    If that had passed, I'd have joined your campaign and told people to home school.

  2. jus wundrin
    Report Abuse
    jus wundrin - September 18, 2013 9:14 pm
    Isnt that what nclb was supposed to do bob? How are you going to bring the inner city standards up bob? You cant until very radical lifestyle changes occur there. What will happen is that the country will be brought down to the inner city standards, then the SAT's, followed by the universities. This is the progressives dream come true: an equally dumbed down society that will be easier to control.
  3. XFSME
    Report Abuse
    XFSME - September 17, 2013 11:27 am
    How about the fact that the common core has never been field tested. If it’s such a wonderful development why not study its effects on students over time? Why the rush by the privatizers of education…., David Coleman, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Joel Klein, Jeb Bush, Michelle Rhee, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, to push these new standards ahead of peer reviewed research? David Coleman, the architect of Common Core, couldn’t even get hired as a teacher, now he will impact every classroom in the country? Mr. McCoy seems to agree with current Secretary of Education Arne Duncan that Federalism, in regards to education, is dead. That is, recognition that the federal government has limited authority, and that states and localities has the primary responsibility for education. With No Child Left Behind, President Bush turned over control of states education progress to the Department of Education and Congress. President Obama has continued this top down approach with Race to the Top and Common Core. Gone are the opportunities for States and local communities to determine their values and have them reflected in the curriculum and direction of instruction. Why Mr. McCoy, because people move? What a ridiculous argument to end local control of school districts. What the “reformers” choose to ignore is that student are a reflection of their communities and surroundings. Public education is in crisis only so far as society is in crisis. Look to the communities that are struggling economically and schools will reflect that. Fix poverty and you’ll go a long way in fixing education.

  4. skepticalteach
    Report Abuse
    skepticalteach - September 17, 2013 10:52 am
    Let's make sure it's not another No Child Left behind. I'm all for a nationalized standard, but the Federal government should not be the record keeper, awarding diplomas and degrees when students have completed 'sufficient' courses. I am all for the States controlling their educational systems.
Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian ( may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick