GEORGE OCHENSKI: Hunting, wildlife communities, just say ‘no’ to FWP’s elk proposal

2014-02-16T22:06:00Z 2014-06-10T06:31:40Z GEORGE OCHENSKI: Hunting, wildlife communities, just say ‘no’ to FWP’s elk proposalBy GEORGE OCHENSKI
February 16, 2014 10:06 pm  • 

That Montanans subsidize the ranching industry with millions of public dollars annually is no great secret. But a recent proposal by ranchers in the Paradise Valley to require the use of hunter license fees to fence their lands and extend the season on lethal elk control measures is an over-the-top bad idea.

That Montana’s Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks is even considering it shows how defunct the agency is in conducting its real business, which is protecting and enhancing our publicly owned wildlife, not subsidizing ranchers who are enjoying record high prices for their cattle right now.

The issue, like the ongoing bison slaughter, is inherently connected to the disease brucellosis, which can cause ungulates to abort. It is a disease that was brought to the state by cattle ranchers, whose livestock then transmitted it to our wildlife. For decades, the ranching industry demanded that Yellowstone National Park’s wild bison be slaughtered en masse if and when they left the boundaries of the park.


Since the ’80s, an estimated 7,500 bison have been sacrificed on the altar of the sacred cow. Their only sin was following their hereditary migration routes to lower elevations when deep snows covered Yellowstone. But merely the process of seeking food brought the last remnants of the millions of bison that once thundered across the Great Plains into contact – and competition – with domestic cattle. Their sentence for that great transgression was death, carried out mercilessly, indiscriminately, and to the great discredit of Montana in the eyes of the nation and world.

That the park is now planning on killing 600-800 more migrating bison this year is unforgivable. But that’s not enough to satisfy the cattle ranchers. Now they want to treat elk the way they have treated bison, killing them indiscriminately because of the mere potential that they might transmit brucellosis to cattle.

Having successfully contained bison, ranchers in the vicinity of Yellowstone National Park were caught by surprise when some of their herds that had not been in contact or even near bison showed up with brucellosis. The only place they might have gotten the disease, so their reasoning goes, is from wild elk. But as everyone knows, elk are not bison, and are not so easy to find, herd, corral, vaccinate or quarantine.

And so, reason the ranchers, the best and easiest thing to do is kill them or, in their vernacular, exert “lethal control.” In the meantime, they’re holding out their hands seeking funding from hunter license fees for fencing their private property to keep the elk out of their feeding and calving areas.

Although it is illegal for the general populace to harass wildlife, Fish, Wildlife and Parks already allows ranchers to haze and kill elk until the end of April. But now, they want to extend that to mid-May, well into elk calving season.

It’s worth noting that cattle are now bringing record high prices of $1.42 a pound on the commodity market. That means every one of those cows dotting the landscape is worth somewhere between $1,000 to $2,000 depending on their weight. Is there some reason that ranchers, like most other businesses, can’t afford to take care of their own lands given the enormous windfall these high prices are reaping for their industry? And what could possibly be the reason they think hunters, who actually help control elk populations, should be the ones to pay?

Even more ironic is that wolf opponents claim wolf reintroduction in Yellowstone “decimated” the Paradise Valley elk herd from its high of 19,000 animals. But apparently that’s still not good enough for the ranchers, who want to kill even more elk because of the mere threat of disease transmission.

But here’s the rub: while there is clear statutory authority to kill and haze elk under Montana’s game damage laws, there is no specific statutory authority for Fish, Wildlife and Parks to haze, harass or kill elk simply for the threat of transmitting disease to domestic livestock. In other words, Montana’s Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks is now contemplating spending hunter license fees – and harassing and killing public wildlife – without specific legal authority to do so.

The time has finally come for Montana’s hunting and wildlife community to finally just say “no” to more ranching subsidies and the slaughter of public wildlife. You can do so by submitting comments online at or in writing to FWP Wildlife Bureau at PO Box 200701, Helena, MT 59620-0701.

George Ochenski writes a weekly column for the Missoulian’s Monday Opinion page. He can be reached at

Copyright 2015 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(3) Comments

  1. Roger
    Report Abuse
    Roger - February 18, 2014 11:11 am
    Well George, don't you believe that wolves reduced the Yellowstone elk from over 19,000 to about 4000? I believe that's a fact - not a "claim".
  2. katqanna
    Report Abuse
    katqanna - February 17, 2014 10:58 am
    I am a hunter and the researcher of this whole elk brucellosis working group program. I have been letting hunters and hunting groups know about this since last spring. I have been attending these meetings, took audio and posted all this online, so that the public would know, because the politics were keeping some in the hunting community from taking a stand. I just sent out a mailing about all this and finally, because of its circulation, the papers picked it up. A number of these journalists are on my list. Politics is what is keeping some silent.
  3. hard rock
    Report Abuse
    hard rock - February 17, 2014 10:01 am
    Thanks for writing about this George. What I don't understand is why isn't the hunting community up in arms about this? The Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation went nuts complaining about wolves killing elk but they don't raise a peep when ranchers want to kill elk in calving season and use "hunter license fees for fencing their private property to keep the elk out of their feeding and calving areas."
Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian ( may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick