Policy development of the Montana Workforce Drug and Alcohol Act

2013-07-17T08:00:00Z Policy development of the Montana Workforce Drug and Alcohol ActGuest column by Paul H. Hutter missoulian.com
July 17, 2013 8:00 am  • 

In part one of this article, we discussed the employer’s requirements in deciding to consider the implementation of the Montana Workforce Drug and Alcohol Act. Once a decision is made, the employer must develop a written policy in accordance with the statute, which needs to include: definitions of key terms regarding drug and alcohol testing, name a policy coordinator responsible for program, set a standard of conduct, discuss rehabilitation, the sanctions for violating the standards of conduct, list the types of testing the employer will conduct, list by job title the employees to be tested, state what drugs the employer will test for, what the prohibited alcohol concentration level is, the testing procedures, dispute resolution procedures and confidentiality requirements. Employers should also provide employees with information on the hazards of illegal substances.

Each employer has an option for termination or rehabilitation for any employee who tests positive.

A Case for Rehabilitation: Based on the employer’s company culture, rehabilitation may be the “right” thing to do. Allowing for rehabilitation speaks volumes about a company’s culture, and tends to often add to the employer as being an “Employer of Choice.” Additionally, despite the fact that the federal regulation provides for termination as an option, termination could potentially bring with it litigation.

A Case for Termination: Termination provides the employees of the company with an understanding that the company is serious and that zero tolerance means zero tolerance. Rehabilitation can present the problem of temporarily filling the position while the employee is at rehabilitation. Secondly, if the employer has a policy of rehabilitation, and an employee that tests positive goes through rehabilitation and then tests positive again in the near future, there is an expectation by the employee that they will be allowed to rehabilitate again. If the policy provides for rehabilitation, it must specify, “first time only.” Lastly, if the employer has the option of termination, and an employee admits to using illegal substances or abusing alcohol, the federal statutes require the employer to allow rehabilitation, but only in this case.

In either case, if an employee refuses to be tested, the policy is to be followed, which means that if the company provides for rehabilitation, then the employee should be allowed to consult with a substance abuse professional. If they refuse, then they are terminated.

Another decision point for the employer is which types of tests to include in their program, such as pre-employment, random, reasonable suspicion and post-accident. Unlike the federal mandate, the state statute allows the employer to choose any or all of the options. (If the employer chooses rehabilitation, then they must also choose return to duty and follow-up testing).

Making a decision to test your employees for drugs and alcohol is a decision not to be taken lightly. Decisions need to be based on a complete understanding of state statute and appropriate consultation with an attorney that understands the Montana Workforce Drug and Alcohol Testing Act.

Paul H. Hutter, SPHR, is vce president of the Western Region with Associated Employers in Billings, a private employers association that provides business and human resources expertise to its members. To learn more, please visit us at associatedemployers.org.

Copyright 2015 missoulian.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(1) Comments

  1. msonelson
    Report Abuse
    msonelson - July 17, 2013 5:15 pm
    Who would have ever thought that in the land of the free you would be required to provide a sample of your blood so you and your family could eat.
Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on Missoulian.com

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian (Missoulian.com) may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in Missoulian.com's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on missoulian.com.

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick