Save women’s lives; urge Baucus to support background checks

2013-10-31T07:45:00Z Save women’s lives; urge Baucus to support background checksGuest column by MARIAN BRADLEY missoulian.com
October 31, 2013 7:45 am  • 

October is “awareness month” for a number of very important causes – breast cancer chief among them – but unfortunately, there is one that often gets lost in the mix. October is also Domestic Violence Awareness Month, a time for us to address this silent epidemic that continues to plague women and families across our country and Montana.

As Montana’s president of the National Organization for Women, I work alongside many incredible individuals to fight against the oppression, discrimination and abuse of women. Fortunately, our own Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., along with Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., and Rep. Steve Daines, R-Mont., can join us in helping save women’s lives by passing common-sense background check legislation that would reduce gun violence in homes across the country and state.

Domestic violence and gun violence are emotional issues. That’s why I think it’s helpful to look at both through the lens of numbers and facts.

The Domestic Violence Abuse Awareness Society estimates that only one in five cases of domestic violence is reported. I’ve known women who have been repeatedly threatened and abused by their spouses, intimate partners or former intimate partners. I’ve seen women stay with their abuser because they desperately hope “it won’t happen again.” 

But many times, it does happen again. People with a history of committing domestic violence are more likely to murder an intimate partner. When there’s a gun in the vicinity of a domestic violence situation, a woman is 500 percent more likely to be murdered by her partner. In 2011, 44 percent of women murdered with guns in the U.S. were killed by current or former intimate partners and each month in the United States, 46 women are shot to death by current or former intimate partners.

Federal law prohibits criminals such as rapists, sex offenders and domestic abusers from buying or possessing guns. Since 1998, the National Instant Criminal Background Check System has blocked more than 2 million gun sales to prohibited purchasers – including more than 250,000 gun sales to domestic abusers.

We already know that background checks on all gun purchases – laws that keep guns out of the hands of domestic abusers – will save women’s lives. In states that do require a background check for every handgun sale, 38 percent fewer women are shot and killed by their intimate partners. And since 1998, more than 250,000 domestic abusers have been blocked from buying guns by the National Instant Criminal Background Check System.

But there are gaps in the existing system that aren’t doing the job of keeping guns out of the hands of dangerous people. The “private sale loophole” in federal law allows domestic abusers, rapists and people with severe mental illness to buy guns online and at gun shows with no questions asked.

More than half of mass shootings involve domestic violence. In at least 57 percent of the mass shootings between January 2009 and September 2013, the shooter killed a current or former intimate partner or family member.

A bipartisan background check bill in the U.S. Senate, known as the Manchin-Toomey legislation, would keep guns out of the hands of serial batterers, rapists, sex offenders and domestic abusers. Similar legislation in the U.S. House would do the same thing.

Unfortunately, Baucus voted against the Manchin-Toomey bill last April. My hope is that since then, Baucus has taken time to listen to the 79 percent of Montanans who support background checks – and to realize that background checks don’t infringe upon our Second Amendment rights in any way, shape or form. Instead, they make it tougher for dangerous people to get their hands on guns.

Someday, maybe we won’t need “awareness months” to remind us to take action on important issues. But until our elected officials take action to make domestic violence murders a thing of the past, we’ll keep fighting for common sense legislation that makes Montana women, families and communities safer.

Background checks save lives. On behalf of many women across Montana, I urge Baucus to vote for the Manchin-Toomey legislation.

Marian Bradley is president of the Montana Chapter of the National Organization for Women.

Copyright 2015 missoulian.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(8) Comments

  1. Objective observer
    Report Abuse
    Objective observer - November 03, 2013 8:25 pm
    "I think it is a sad situation in a domestic abuse case, but the statistics show the individual is already known to be what he is and the women just refuses to see it."

    Typical "blame the victim" comment.
  2. Objective observer
    Report Abuse
    Objective observer - November 03, 2013 8:24 pm
    Silly deflection.
  3. listen
    Report Abuse
    listen - November 02, 2013 7:10 am
    Good analogy Stan. " Save me! Save me! Do something! I can't stop feeding my mouth!" "Save me from my abusive partner, I mean "inmate". He's loving me to death. And he's using a gun...knife...axe....baseball bat....hamburgers....beer....meth.... "
  4. jus wundrin
    Report Abuse
    jus wundrin - November 01, 2013 8:06 pm
    Silly letter.

    How about the abuse that women receive at the hands of pornographers marian? You know, those folks that are supported by the progressive party that your organization supports?
  5. Stan Reck
    Report Abuse
    Stan Reck - October 31, 2013 3:51 pm
    More background checks can be paired with the war on drugs. It doesn't matter if you make it illegal or harder to get, people will get them (drugs or guns). Saying that domestic violence will decrease without guns is like saying a fat person will get skinny without McDonald's around...it just doesn't add up. There are some women out there that are afraid of leaving a abusive relationship, your talents and efforts would be better used helping those women that are unable to leave instead of taking away rights from everyone else to temporarily (yes, it is only temporary) disarm an abuser (if he has prior convictions).
  6. Northern Owl
    Report Abuse
    Northern Owl - October 31, 2013 2:54 pm
    Definitely a well-written article! As common sense explains, aspects of domestic abuse and gun violence weave together as they do in the reality of life. I don't believe our Founding Fathers ever meant for the 2nd Amendment to be used as it is now . . .
  7. trad man
    Report Abuse
    trad man - October 31, 2013 1:52 pm
    greatly written article but the facts don't match up. I would like to know just where the % etc. came from as they are not anywhere close to the actual ones. I think it is a sad situation in a domestic abuse case, but the statistics show the individual is already known to be what he is and the women just refuses to see it. A smart women knows the signs and get's out of there, maybe more education would help enlighten these women to not fall into these kinds of traps. Mean while I would sure like to know some answers about these phony statistics .....just another anti gun blather be my guess
  8. Roger
    Report Abuse
    Roger - October 31, 2013 8:20 am
    Unfortunately background checks result in de facto firearm registration, unacceptable in a country that guarantees the right of the people to own and carry guns. Women need to get out of these unions with men who abuse women - surely the signs are there. Firearms are used in defense of self and/or home many times each year.
Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on Missoulian.com

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian (Missoulian.com) may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in Missoulian.com's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on missoulian.com.

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick