Support land access bill

2013-02-13T08:45:00Z 2013-02-14T11:12:13Z Support land access billGuest column by ROBERT WOOD
February 13, 2013 8:45 am  • 

For those of you who have not heard, Rep. Ellie Hill from Missoula has introduced House Bill 235, which would allow corner crossing in Montana. Corner crossing is when a person comes to a corner where four parcels meet and steps over the corner onto another property.

For example, as I am facing the junction of four parcels, the parcel I am standing on is public property while the parcels to my right and left are private property – but the parcel directly in front of me is also public property. HB235 would allow me to step from the public property, over the junction, onto the other parcel of public property. This bill would only allow for foot traffic. Go to under the 2013 Legislator tab to review the text of the bill and the legal memorandum from the Goetz law firm.

Currently, there is no statute allowing corner crossing and the legality is a gray area. By placing a statute into law specifically allowing corner crossing, the gray area is removed and people will be able to access public land from public land. There are estimates that corner crossing could possibly allow access to over 1 million acres of public land in Montana.

There are those who claim corner crossing violates their private property rights and constitutes a “taking.” The Goetz law firm in Bozeman, which successfully argued the Stream Access Law in the Supreme Court, has issued a memorandum on HB235 wherein the last paragraph states: “For the reasons set forth herein, HB235, if passed into law, will not constitute a taking and is constitutional under the Montana and Federal Constitutions.“

In 2005, a legislator brought forth a bill to allow corner crossing that never made it out of committee. Times have changed and with today’s technology through the use of GPS’s and the associated land ownership software/chips, a person can find the actual “corner” where the parcels meet. This was not the case in 2005.

This is not just an issue impacting hunters but also fishermen, hikers and bird watchers. Recreational hiking in Montana is prevalent throughout the state. Think about the opportunities to legally hike on the vast amount of public land which currently is not legally open. Many of these parcels are in the national forest, with beautiful landscapes, small streams and a variety of wildlife and birds.

HB235 was defeated in the House Judiciary Committee on Jan. 30. The sponsor, Hill, is going to try and “blast” it out of committee by requesting a vote on the House floor. She needs 60 out of 100 votes to move the bill from committee to the House floor. This “blast” motion is going to take place on Monday, Feb. 18, which is the President’s Day holiday. There is a rally scheduled on the 18 at the Capitol after the vote.

Though we cannot testify at the hearing, which will start at 1 p.m., we can be in the gallery showing our support for HB235 and letting the legislators see how important this bill is to Montanans. All those wishing to attend need to be at the Capitol by 12:15, and please wear a hunter orange vest.

We are arranging for a bus to take us to and from Missoula and Helena that will be free of charge. It will leave at 9:30 from the Grant Creek Town Pump. If you are interested in being on the bus, please email to reserve space.

There is also a petition that can be signed in support of HB235. Go to under the 2013 Legislator tab. If you sign the petition, you are automatically linked to another petition on gun rights. This is in no way associated with HB235 or the Montana Sportsmen Alliance and we have asked that it be changed, but the host website says it is a random placement and they cannot change it.

If you support the concept of accessing public lands from adjacent public lands, please contact every legislator you know from both parties with your thoughts and, if possible, be at the Capitol at 12:15 on Feb. 18.

Robert Wood of Hamilton is treasurer for the Montana Sportsmen Alliance political action committee.

Copyright 2015 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(3) Comments

  1. D
    Report Abuse
    D - February 13, 2013 11:03 am
    I'm all for public access to public land. There is already a tool available to acquire these conduits over private land--it's called eminent domain. Why doesn't a legislator come up with a Bill to have the State acquire these easements through eminent domain? Probably because it's easier to "take" it from private property owners?

    We private property owners are responsible and held liable for any claims that occur on our property, which means more costly insurance...if insurance companies will even insure us if this Bill passes.
  2. Dub
    Report Abuse
    Dub - February 13, 2013 10:45 am
    When will people learn the true meaning of "private property rights?" I am a hunter and a land owner where there is hunting and am offended that someone from Missoula is trying to force me to allow trespassing by people that do not have permission. There is no way this can be policed or accurately enforced. What about someone in a wheel chair, needs a cane or just stumbles and goes out side of the imaginary X? This will NOT foster good relations with land owners and no matter how many people from Missoula show up in a bus, the ranchers and farmers of the state will fight this. Another example of lack of respect and a "taking" or real property rights.
  3. BobbyLee
    Report Abuse
    BobbyLee - February 13, 2013 9:34 am
    I once had this issue as a landowner. Come hunting season I invariably came across my wire cut and was only fortunate never to have my animals high-tailing it all over the county. My solution was an old-fashioned English Stile *, buit simply with available wood, allowing anyone to step over the fence from one corner to the other.

Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian ( may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick