THOMAS SOWELL: Busybody politics goes too far

2013-08-14T08:15:00Z THOMAS SOWELL: Busybody politics goes too far
August 14, 2013 8:15 am

It is hard to read a newspaper, or watch a television newscast, without encountering someone who has come up with a new “solution” to society’s “problems.” Sometimes it seems as if there are more solutions than there are problems. On closer scrutiny, it turns out that many of today’s problems are a result of yesterday’s solutions.

San Francisco and New York City are both plagued with large “homeless” populations today, largely as a result of previous housing “reforms” that made housing more expensive, and severely limited how much housing, and of what kind, could be built.

The solution? Spend more of the taxpayers’ money making homelessness a viable lifestyle for more people.

Education is a field with endless reforms, creating endless problems, requiring endless solutions. One of the invincible fallacies among educators is that all sorts of children can be educated in the same classroom. Not just children of different races, but children of different abilities, languages and values.

Isn’t it nice to think so? I suspect that even most conservatives would prefer to live in the kind of world conjured up in the liberals’ imagination, rather than in the kind of world we are in fact stuck with.

The result is that many very bright children are bored to the point of becoming behavior problems, when the school work is slowed to a pace within the range of students who are slower learners.

By federal law, even children with severe mental or emotional problems must be “mainstreamed” into classes for other students – often in disregard of how much this disrupts these classes and sacrifices the education of the other children.

Parents who complain about the effect of these “solutions” on their own children’s education are made to feel guilty for not being more “understanding” about the problems of handicapped students.

Nothing is easier for third party busybodies than being “understanding” and “compassionate” at someone else’s expense – especially if the busybodies have their own children in private schools, as so many public school educators do.

Whether in housing, education or innumerable other aspects of life, the key to busybody politics, and its endlessly imposed “solutions,” is that third parties pay no price for being wrong.

This not only presents opportunities for the busybodies to engage in moral preening, but also to flatter themselves that they know better what is good for other people than these other people know for themselves.

Right now, there are people inside and outside of government who are proposing new restrictions on how you may or may not visit the national parks that your taxes support. Among their proposals is doing away with trash cans in these parks, so that visitors have to take their trash out with them.

Just how they would enforce this, when millions of people are visiting places like Yosemite or Yellowstone, is something the busybodies need not bother to think through – much less pay a price, when trash simply accumulates in these parks after trash cans are removed.

What could lead anyone to believe that they have either the right or the omniscience to dictate to hundreds of millions of other people? Our educational system may have something to do with that, with their constant promotion of “self-esteem,” and especially their emphasis on developing “leaders.”

Our schools and colleges are turning out people who cannot feel fulfilled unless they are telling other people what to do. The price of their self-indulgence is the sacrifice of our freedom. If we don’t defend ourselves against them, who will?

Thomas Sowell’s column appears each Wednesday on the Missoulian’s Opinion page.

Copyright 2015 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(7) Comments

  1. snickers
    Report Abuse
    snickers - August 20, 2013 8:10 pm
    wow, that read was a total waste of my time.............
  2. jus wundrin
    Report Abuse
    jus wundrin - August 15, 2013 8:59 am
    Great letter Mr. Sowell. It goes back to the adage of how many gubment entities are required to change a light bulb.
  3. claudius
    Report Abuse
    claudius - August 14, 2013 12:39 pm
    The usual pontificating by Sowell.

    Warehouse the less gifted students and focus only on the ones "worth" educating, encouraging even more nasty tantrums from the people who believe they shouldn't have to pay taxes that benefit anyone but themselves.

    Quit being concerned about homeless people and trying to help them recover the lives they lost due to millions of jobs being shipped overseas and the economy wrecked by greed-driven financial firms. Instead, just let them die under a bridge somewhere, and the problem will go away.

    How incredibly ..... compassionate. And he has the brass-plated nerve to complain about "third-party busybodies" wanting to help somebody at his expense.

  4. Roger
    Report Abuse
    Roger - August 14, 2013 11:54 am
    Great essay - Sowell is an excellent columnist. Dumbing down the schools to accommodate incompetent or unruly "students" is stupid.
  5. BR
    Report Abuse
    BR - August 14, 2013 11:03 am
    Clearly, Sowell knows little or nothing about education in a mass society, or about much of anything for that matter, though I do agree with him in his negative attitude about less and less services in our national parks.
  6. Salish
    Report Abuse
    Salish - August 14, 2013 9:37 am
    Oh goodie! Another Sowell rant. Simply not worth the space he takes up here, nor worthy of intelligent discussion participation by any of the rest of us.
  7. Don Bergoust
    Report Abuse
    Don Bergoust - August 14, 2013 8:46 am
    Great reasoning that should be noted in the ongoing debate about the POV and Missoula 3:16 and their new digs.
Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian ( may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick