Missoula serious about cell ban

2012-11-08T08:30:00Z Missoula serious about cell banMissoulian editorial missoulian.com
November 08, 2012 8:30 am  • 

It was only a matter of time before Missoula joined the other major municipalities of Montana in adopting a strict ban on driving while using a cellphone.

While Missoula was among the first to propose such a prohibition, it was one of the last to actually adopt one. Missoula City Councilors approved a law against using a cellphone while operating a vehicle in 2009 but Mayor John Engen vetoed all but the ban on texting while driving, citing the need for an exemption for hands-free devices.

The ban passed by City Council last Monday includes just such an exemption. Missoula now has less than 30 days to get used to the idea of driving without a cellphone in hand before police start issuing warnings, and another 60 days before police start issuing citations.

The new ordinance is expected to be a lot easier for Missoula police to enforce than the ban on texting. Officers often couldn’t determine whether drivers were truly texting or merely dialing a number; now, they’ll be able to issue a citation if they catch a driver doing either.

And enforcement, along with education, is key. Drivers feel free to ignore a law that lacks teeth, rendering any ordinance meaningless and useless for its intended purpose – decreasing the number of traffic accidents and fatalities.

However, in the three years since Missoula passed its texting ordinance, police were able to write fewer than 30 tickets.

Compare that to Helena, where police issued more than 300 citations this year alone. Or Billings, where police have given nearly 400 warnings to drivers and written nearly 400 tickets so far this year. Butte nabbed 30 drivers in one three-day blitz alone using unmarked cars. These cities are sending a clear signal that they are serious about enforcing this ordinance.

Missoula needs to send a similar signal, and the ordinance is set up to accomplish this. The law directs half the money collected from its fines toward signs and education efforts about the hazards of distracted driving. And with minimum fines starting at $100, Missoula City Council members predict the fines will quickly add up.

Despite the steep fine and the fact that most cellphone owners are guilty of “dialing and driving” at least some of the time, public support for the cellphone prohibition has been strong in Missoula, with most of the people at council meetings voicing support for stricter limits on cellphone use by drivers. The most recent public meeting on the ordinance was packed with Missoula residents, most of whom told the council they favor of the new ordinance.

This is because many Missoulians recognize the dangers inherent in distracted driving – often through personal experience.

Councilman Dave Strohmaier, who forwarded the original 2009 ordinance and shepherded the amended version this year, said that he has continued to hear complaints from constituents about narrowly avoided accidents and traffic violations caused by drivers distracted by cellphones.

The newly passed ordinance includes sensible exemptions for two-way radios, emergency vehicles and emergency phone calls. And, of course, an exemption for hands-free devices – which remains a point of contention for some Missoulians.

Various studies have concluded that it is indeed just as dangerous to drive using a hands-free device as a hand-held one. Last year, the National Transportation Safety Board recommended that traffic safety laws include a ban on both kinds of communication devices.

Apparently, Missoula isn’t ready for a ban on hands-free devices just yet. In the meantime, those drivers who simply must communicate with people other than the passengers inside their car can pick up an earpiece for as little as $30.

EDITORIAL BOARD: Publisher Jim McGowan, Editor Sherry Devlin, Opinion Editor Tyler Christensen

Copyright 2015 missoulian.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(6) Comments

  1. Curmudgeon
    Report Abuse
    Curmudgeon - November 15, 2012 2:09 pm
    People who claim that they are never distracted (and can text or dial or phone or put on lipstick while concentrating on driving) remind me of some other folks:

    The people who claim, "I can always drive better with a little Jack Daniels under my belt."
  2. Curmudgeon
    Report Abuse
    Curmudgeon - November 15, 2012 2:00 pm
    You got that right, BANDIT218 --- I'm up for canonization next week.
    Report Abuse
    R U KIDDING - November 09, 2012 8:59 am
    WHAT A JOKE! more over reaching, what's next gps ban, coffee cup ban, tissue ban, I know happy meal ban, no more changing the radio until you come to a full and complete stop! Dont you dare search for that song on your iphone while moving!!! No more driving while plucking your eye brows and plastering on your make up, because you are not capable, you are not a good driver, 3 hands on the wheel! Welcome to the new Nanny City, with unisex bathrooms
  4. Born Here
    Report Abuse
    Born Here - November 08, 2012 9:45 pm
    Why the exception for police/emergency responders?? They have two way radios, always have. What do they need cell phones for? The FM radio relay network is way more reliable then cell phones anyway. I see cops driving around all the time on the phone, is it ALL official business?? Who monitors that? I appreciate the fact that they might be coming to save my happy a$$, some day, but, it appears as if they are perceived to be superior drivers, and have skills the majority of us mortals do not possess. Believe me, a few weeks at the academy doesn't make you a Mario Andretti..
  5. Bandit218
    Report Abuse
    Bandit218 - November 08, 2012 4:50 pm
    Because Curmudgeon is never selfish. He always thinks about other people.
  6. Curmudgeon
    Report Abuse
    Curmudgeon - November 08, 2012 2:38 pm
    It's a start. Nobody NEEDS to be asking "What's for dinner tonight?" while driving. If some call is REALLY important, a driver can always pull to the side, stop the vehicle, and then call.

    People don't because of a very human failing called "selfishness". The attitude that "My convenience is more important than your safety".

    Such folks are "scofflaws", and deserve to be slapped down, hard.
Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on Missoulian.com

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian (Missoulian.com) may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in Missoulian.com's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on missoulian.com.

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick