MISSOULIAN EDITORIAL: Site finally picked; time to end Missoula College delays

2013-10-06T08:00:00Z 2014-10-19T08:07:34Z MISSOULIAN EDITORIAL: Site finally picked; time to end Missoula College delays missoulian.com
October 06, 2013 8:00 am

University of Montana President Royce Engstrom made the decision last week to build the new Missoula College on East Broadway.

More than anything, the announcement came as a relief. At last Missoula can get past the stale arguments that have held up this vital project for almost 10 years – and move on to all new ones.

That’s only half a joke. In truth, the East Broadway site likely isn’t anyone’s first choice, but it satisfies the college’s most important needs while avoiding a likely lawsuit from opponents of UM’s original South Campus location.

However, it comes with its own set of challenges – challenges that the college will overcome all the faster if the larger Missoula community pitches in to help resolve them in a timely manner.

Within sight of Washington-Grizzly Stadium just across the Clark Fork River, the new Missoula College building will bring more than 2,000 students to a new part of town on a regular basis. The East Broadway area will undergo a sea change.

In what ways will transportation and traffic be affected? How about commerce? What will residents who live near the proposed college experience? Will the location of the new building drive up demand for student housing in surrounding neighborhoods?

These questions and more will be studied in depth as UM proceeds with its plans to build the new college. The Legislature set aside $29 million to build the college, but it’s likely that costs will rise the longer it takes to complete the project.

Fortunately, one of the strengths of the East Broadway spot is that it comes already equipped with infrastructure – water, electricity, etc. – that would have cost more money and time if they had to be installed new.

Still, construction probably won’t begin until next year, when the university expects to have completed further studies, such as an environmental assessment. It also has to hire an architect to create a new design for the building, but another of the East Broadway location’s strengths, Engstrom explained, is that is “gives architects a little more flexibility.”

Flexibility has been sorely missing in the past several years of debate over the college’s location. While the South Campus was Engstrom’s preferred location for the new college, a loosely organized group called Advocates for Missoula’s Future steadfastly opposed it, arguing instead that university land at Fort Missoula was the best option. UM leaders, however, flat-out rejected Fort Missoula for a variety of reasons.

Those reasons were never deemed satisfactory to Advocates for Missoula’s Future, which announced in May its intention to bring a lawsuit against the university if plans to develop the South Campus – particularly the university golf course – went forward.

Also in May, Engstrom offered the East Broadway site as an alternative.

Some members of the Advocates group voiced opposition to this location too, maintaining that Fort Missoula is still the best site. Meanwhile, the Associated Students of the University of Montana endorsed the South Campus. And Missoula Mayor Jon Engen, along with several members of City Council, unhelpfully suggested that UM consider yet another option – buying the former Fox Theater site downtown. That idea was, not surprisingly, rebuffed.

Now, thankfully, it appears that ASUM, Advocates and Engen are all on board with the East Broadway plan. In fact, Engen restated his intention to continue exploring downtown options for student housing. The mayor of Missoula and the president of the University of Montana have been working on a plan to identify 1,000 new units of student housing by the end of 2014. Now that a firm location for Missoula College has been decided, perhaps that project will receive a little more momentum.

A new Missoula College will attract more two-year students, train them for good-paying jobs and provide a much-needed economic boost to the local economy. It will expand on the skills available within the local workforce to the benefit of employers and employees alike.

Missoula ought to have been clamoring for new, state-of-the-art facilities designed to better train this emerging work force. Instead, we have wasted years arguing over the location of Missoula College. Let’s not allow any further delay.

EDITORIAL BOARD: Publisher Jim McGowan, Editor Sherry Devlin, Opinion Editor Tyler Christensen

Copyright 2015 missoulian.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(2) Comments

  1. David1
    Report Abuse
    David1 - October 06, 2013 9:39 pm
    Missoulian: "...we have wasted years arguing over the location of Missoula College. Let’s not allow any further delay." If Pres. Dennison had not canceled siting the then-COT at its West Campus when he canceled the Hydrogen Futures Park some 8-9 years ago, there would have been no "wasted years."

    There would have been no golf course/South Campus controversy. MC can still be sited on its West Campus in the same time frame as building at East Broadway and wind up as the comprehensive, consolidated community college it should have been all along.

    Stand beside Dennison and Engstrom, Missoulian. Look in the mirror. It's you people responsible for the "wasted years" and the "delay." No one else. Yes, let us delay no longer:
    build MC where it should have been years ago, at its West Campus site.

  2. zena
    Report Abuse
    zena - October 06, 2013 12:40 pm
    Missoula came out the winner . Number one, it is not now, or ever has been the South Campus. It is the University Athletic Fields, or more commonly known as the U of M Golf Course.
    The Advocates started out loosely organized as a small group of citizens who all had the same goal in mind. To stop the University from building on the Athletic Fields. We spent countless hours doing research. Several of us went on our own nickle as individuals, not as Advocates to Helena to testify last winter. We incorporated, and got more organized as time went buy. Are we happy? You Betcha. It shows a small group of citizens (plus 6000 signatures on petitions) can affect change. I want my granddaughter
    to grow up and show that beautiful piece of land to her children. Call it by its correct name, which is the U of M athletic fields.

    Peggy Cain
    VP of Advocates for Missoulas' Future
    Candidate for Mayor of Missoula
Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on Missoulian.com

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian (Missoulian.com) may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in Missoulian.com's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on missoulian.com.

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick