American Tradition Partnership: Feds take secretive conservative group's documents

2012-12-21T06:00:00Z 2013-03-25T20:34:40Z American Tradition Partnership: Feds take secretive conservative group's documents
December 21, 2012 6:00 am

HELENA — State officials said Thursday that a federal grand jury has subpoenaed disputed documents involving a secretive conservative group that critics argue has been illegally coordinating with candidates.

The disclosure was made by state officials responding to a Livingston judge's order requesting the American Tradition Partnership documents. The documents were featured in an October documentary by "Frontline" and a story by ProPublica suggesting the tax-exempt social welfare group coordinated with Republican candidates.

ATP has been seeking their return, saying they were stolen in Denver in 2010.

District Judge Nels Swandal issued an order Monday telling the state that he would take custody of the American Tradition Partnership "Colorado" documents to make sure they are not lost, stolen or again disclosed to the public. The judge cited a potential pre-election break-in at the commissioner's office, along with that office's decision to at one time let reporters view the documents.

But the commissioner of political practices on Thursday told the state court that the documents — along with others — were turned over following a grand jury's subpoena that was received a day earlier.

"My office has complied with the subpoena, and the Colorado documents are in the possession of federal authorities," James Murry said in a Thursday affidavit.

Officials with the commissioner's office said Thursday that they have been instructed to not comment further on the case.

An assistant attorney general representing the commissioner's office told Swandal's court that the subpoena request came from the United States District Court for the District of Montana.

The U.S. Attorney's office did not return a call seeking comment.

American Tradition Partnership released a statement earlier in the day lauding Swandal for ordering the state to hand over the documents. It did not address the more recent revelation that federal officials had already seized the documents.

The lawsuit seeking return of the documents was originally filed by Christian LeFer, a Livingston consultant who has done work for ATP.

A separate batch of documents that were released by a different state court last month showed the group's bank records were intermingled with those of a printing business run by LeFer's wife.

A state judge last month sanctioned the group for failing to provide more information on its activities, requested as part of a case where state authorities argue it has been illegally involved in election efforts without disclosing donations and expenditures.

Two Republican lawmakers subsequently filed complaints with the commissioner of political practices alleging that bank and other records released show American Tradition Partnership illegally coordinated with their primary election opponents. Critics have called ATP a "dark money" group that intentionally hides electioneering efforts.

American Tradition Partnership has previously denounced those claims as "false and meritless."

On Thursday, the group claimed that Murry was in the wrong for previously failing to return the documents that are now the subject of a federal grand jury subpoena.

"ATP always obeys every letter of every applicable law," said Executive Director Donny Ferguson, executive director of his group based in the Washington D.C. area. "Everything we do is not just legal but in pursuit of accountable government."

ATP has also gained notoriety for successfully mounting legal attacks on Montana election laws, including one lawsuit that led to the U.S. Supreme Court's June decision to strike down the 1912 law banning direct expenditures by corporations for or against candidates.

Copyright 2015 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(2) Comments

  1. dsrobins
    Report Abuse
    dsrobins - December 21, 2012 2:49 pm
    It will be nice to see some top officials of ATP on trial after the federal grand jury finishes its work.
  2. Watching
    Report Abuse
    Watching - December 21, 2012 10:20 am
    These documents are in better hands. I'm a bit leery of Judge Swandal since I heard him preaching to the tea bagger choir when he was running for a position on the Supreme Court in 2010. He used all the proper right-wing buzz phrases, and quoted the Declaration of Independence: ". . . the right to life, liberty and property." The enthusiastic Bitterroot tea bagger crowd cheered him mightily, which, by itself, was enough evidence for me that he did not deserve to be elected. Thank goodness, he wasn't. ATP is a shady organization that just successfully challenged Montana's 100-year-old ban on corporate campaign contributions. Good to know their documents are in the hands of a federal grand jury. This is a story worth following. It will be interesting to see what's in these documents. Details of corporate contributions to elected officials currently in office, perhaps?
Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian ( may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Search our events calendar