Tester discusses setbacks in Forest Jobs and Recreation bill

2010-08-30T23:45:00Z 2010-08-31T06:32:18Z Tester discusses setbacks in Forest Jobs and Recreation billBy ROB CHANEY of the Missoulian missoulian.com
August 30, 2010 11:45 pm  • 

The first questioner at Sen. Jon Tester's Monday public forum in Missoula wanted to know how the Forest Jobs and Recreation Act was coming along.

"My wife and I just drove over through Lincoln, and there's crystal-clear evidence we need to manage in a different way," Tester said of the beetle-killed acres of forest. "We need to give the Forest Service some different tools to work with."

But Tester also needs a committee date to work with if his bill stands a chance of becoming law this year. After a flurry of anticipation earlier in August, Congress recessed without bringing S. 1470 before the Senate Natural Resources Committee.

"We're 95 percent there to get it out of committee," Tester said. "It still revolves around the cut language. There's going to be mechanical treatment in that bill - there's got to be."

Tester has hit the most opposition from fellow senators and some Montanans on his proposed mandate of harvesting at least 10,000 acres a year from three national forests in Montana. Committee staff sent him a revised draft in June with the logging mandate removed.

Tester sent back a new version with the cut restored, but he stretched it from 10 years to 15 and incorporated the Forest Service's new watershed-level environmental analysis to pick harvest sites instead of a more cumbersome landscape-level environmental impact statement.

Plans to create 670,000 acres of new federal wilderness and another 336,000 acres of mixed-use recreation areas remain unchanged.

Tester said his new draft remains the one under consideration. He added it emphasizes taking timber from roaded areas where wildfire danger threatens houses and communities, while staying away from more pristine roadless areas in national forests.

Tester spokeswoman Andrea Helling said she hoped the bill would get its hearing soon after the Senate reconvenes in mid-September. Assuming it clears the committee, it could go to the full Senate as a stand-alone bill, be amended into related forest management legislation or rolled into an omnibus public lands bill.

Reporter Rob Chaney can be reached at 523-5382 or at rchaney@missoulian.com.


Copyright 2015 missoulian.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on Missoulian.com

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian (Missoulian.com) may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in Missoulian.com's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on missoulian.com.

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick