Baucus pushes Rocky Mountain Front wilderness bill

2012-03-22T23:15:00Z 2013-02-21T05:48:16Z Baucus pushes Rocky Mountain Front wilderness billBy ROB CHANEY of the Missoulian
March 22, 2012 11:15 pm  • 

Supporters of the Rocky Mountain Front Heritage Act had their day in Congress on Thursday when U.S. Sen. Max Baucus led off testimony on the bill.

“I think this is a no-brainer,” Baucus told Senate Public Lands and Forests Subcommittee chairman Sen. Ron Wyden. “There’s no conflict. People worked very hard to make this happen. I hope we can get this passed this year.”

Choteau rancher Dusty Crary called the bill “our homeland security bill.” The act would add 67,000 acres to the Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex and designate another 208,000 acres of U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management land as conservation management areas that allow existing recreational uses such as chainsaws to clear trails.

The bill also earned qualified support from U.S. Forest Service Deputy Chief Leslie Weldon. She said the agency wanted to consult with the subcommittee on the timeframe for imposing a new non-motorized recreation plan and noxious weed control efforts. Weldon previously led the Forest Service’s Region 1 headquarters in Missoula.

BLM deputy director Mike Pool supported the legislation.

Crary said the bill was five years in the making, and tried to balance the interests of all groups that work, play and visit the Rocky Mountain Front. He said some argued for larger wilderness designations, while others wanted more space for motorized recreation. The bill was a “start-from-scratch, kitchen table proposal,” he said.

One of those critics was Matthew Koehler of the Missoula-based Wild West Institute. He objected to language that made public land grazing permits more permanent, opening the way for greater herbicide use on noxious weeds and military overflights.

“The 67,000 acres of wilderness designations along the Rocky Mountain Front proposed by Sen. Baucus is a paltry sum, given the world-class, and largely unprotected wildlands and wildlife habitat currently found along the Rocky Mountain Front,” Koehler wrote in an email. “Even the Forest Service has recommended more wilderness protections in their forest plans for the area than what Sen. Baucus is proposing.”

Over the past decade, Baucus and former Sen. Conrad Burns worked to retire most of the oil and gas exploration leases on federal land along the Rocky Mountain Front. Baucus said while he encouraged petroleum development away from the mountain range, his current bill would not affect development on state and private land.

“I’ve been involved in wilderness bills that came the other way – top down – it doesn’t work,” Baucus told the subcommittee. “They haven’t tried to jam something down somebody’s throat. It would be a tragedy if we let them down.”

Reporter Rob Chaney can be reached at 523-5382 or at

Copyright 2015 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian ( may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Search our events calendar