Baucus: U.S. combat troops should exit Afghanistan

2012-03-14T06:45:00Z 2012-03-14T14:49:28Z Baucus: U.S. combat troops should exit AfghanistanBy MIKE DENNISON Missoulian State Bureau

HELENA – As the debate over U.S. military presence in Afghanistan intensifies, Montana’s senior senator, Max Baucus, is continuing his call for an accelerated withdrawal all U.S. combat troops.

Just last week, Baucus, a Democrat, led a group of 24 senators who signed a letter to President Barack Obama, urging a quick withdrawal of combat troops and a shift toward using troops only as advisers.

And in an interview Tuesday, Baucus said U.S. combat troops should be withdrawn from Afghanistan more quickly than is proposed by the Obama administration.

“I just think it’s time to redirect our resources to where they’re most needed,” said Baucus, noting that Obama wants $88 billion in spending on Afghanistan in 2013, while also proposing cuts in ag programs or other items that Americans need. “We don’t need a large army in Afghanistan.”

Obama has directed U.S. military commanders to reduce U.S. combat troops in Afghanistan from 90,000 to 68,000 by September.

The New York Times also reported on Tuesday that the administration is considering removing 10,000 more soldiers by year’s end and another 10,000 to 20,000 by mid-2013. The administration said no formal options have been devised.

Baucus’ recent letter and statements on Afghanistan are reiterations of what he’s been saying for almost a year. Last May, he said American combat troops should be withdrawn by the end of 2012, and he and 27 other senators sent a letter last June calling for a strategy shift in the Middle Eastern country.

The letter last week was “a bit stronger letter,” he said Tuesday, noting that it still represented one-fourth of the Senate, including two Republicans and top Democratic leaders such as Charles Schumer of New York and Dick Durbin of Illinois.

Baucus also said Tuesday he’s flexible on when troops should be brought home, but that the withdrawal should be faster than proposed by Obama.

Enough troops should remain to help combat terrorism in Afghanistan, but the human and national cost of having a large military force there is too much, he said.

He noted that more than 1,900 American troops have died in Afghanistan, including nine Montanans, as well as more than 14,300 injured, including 75 Montanans.

“Montanans are such patriots,” Baucus said. “Our troops have done their job; their mission is largely accomplished. Al-Qaida is on the run, Osama bin Laden is gone. … (But) I think that nation-building should not be a major mission today.”

He said the nation “has issues at home that we have to take care of,” like maintaining post offices, roads and veterans’ health care.

Baucus said he senses that Congress is moving toward support of an accelerated withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan, but that it takes time for the appropriations process to play out before Congress this year.

Missoulian State Bureau reporter Mike Dennison can be reached at 1-800-525-4920 or at

Copyright 2015 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian ( may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Search our events calendar