GOP legislators criticize Montana governor's vetoes

2013-05-07T20:45:00Z GOP legislators criticize Montana governor's vetoes

HELENA – Republican legislators on Tuesday criticized the number of vetoes by Democratic Gov. Steve Bullock and some specific ones.

Before the session started, both Bullock and Republican leaders had expressed a desire to work together for Montana’s future.

Some GOP legislators wondered about their future relationship with Bullock.

“I wasn’t very happy,” said Senate Taxation Chairman Bruce Tutvedt, R-Kalispell. “I had high expectations that Gov. Bullock would act like (former Govs.) Marc Racicot or Ted Schwinden, but he chose a more aggressive stance, more like (Gov.) Brian Schweitzer, than I was hoping for.”

Bullock in his first session issued 71 outright vetoes. That’s second only to Schweitzer, who vetoed 78 bills in 2011 for the most of any Montana governor in at least 40 years.

On Monday, Bullock did sign Tutvedt’s bill to lower the property tax on business equipment, but vetoed his bill to exempt from property taxes air and water pollution control equipment installed after Dec. 31, 2012.

“I was aware it had a risk (of veto),” Tutvedt said. “I had business executives and a lot of people make phone calls. We thought it had a chance.”

Tutvedt said he wasn’t surprised that Bullock vetoed his income tax simplification bill, saying, “Maybe the bill wasn’t ready for prime time.”

Bullock, at a later news conference, defended his vetoes and added, “I don’t think it changes the tone I tried to set and the ability to cooperate.”

Bullock said he made it clear in his proposed budget, his State of the State speech and throughout the session he wanted a projected mid-2015 budget surplus of $300 million, with the state not spending more than it’s taking in.

Bullock said he issued a substantial number of vetoes for a couple of reasons.

The Legislature delivered 200 bills to him after it adjourned, not allowing time to negotiate with lawmakers through amendatory vetoes.

What’s more, he said, the budget left by the Legislature was $120 million short of his goal to have a projected surplus of $300 million, and the budget spent more than it took in.

“I took and take the responsibility that we have a balanced budget very seriously,” he said.

Bullock said the veto decisions were difficult, but he used them to cut the budget by $150 million to reach the $300 million.


Senate Majority Leader Art Wittich, R-Bozeman, was disappointed Bullock vetoed his bill calling for a one-time, 5 percent, $47 million cut in income taxes.

“It’s sad,” Wittich said. “With a $450 million (beginning) surplus, there should have been some general tax relief.”

“He (Bullock) was really pretty silent throughout the session,” Wittich added. “He stayed on the second floor. A lot of his veto messages include points that were never brought up in the hearings. Many were surprises. That’s a waste of all of our time.”

House Speaker Mark Blasdel, R-Somers, said the vetoes showed where Bullock’s priorities are: “That’s state government and state employees, and not with the everyday citizens and taxpayers of the state.”

Senate President Jeff Essmann, R-Billings, said unlike the majority of the Legislature, he agreed with Bullock about the need for a larger surplus because of economic uncertainties.

“I wish the governor had taken a sharper pencil to government spending,” Essmann said. “My view of his actions is the government got what it wanted, the governor got what he wanted, but Montana taxpayers got left holding the bag.”

In past sessions, many bills have been delivered to the governor after the Legislature adjourns, Essmann said.

“We gave him some early, and he put amendatory vetoes on them and screwed them up,” Essmann said. “He did not negotiate with most of his amendatory vetoes, so why go through that meaningless exercise?”

Essmann said he was surprised that Bullock vetoed many bills sponsored by the so-called “crossover coalition,” the Republicans who sided with Democrats on many key issues and against their own leadership.

“These guys gave him a pension bailout in the form he wanted, not one that protected Montana taxpayers in the long run,” Essmann said. “They increased spending in the government agencies by double digits. For a lot of tax cut bills, they either did not make it out of committee or died on the floor.

“They apparently did not buy much good will with the governor, not for all the water they carried for him.”

In response, Tutvedt, who was part that group, disagreed with Essmann.

“There never was a deal,” Tutvedt said. “We just did the right thing for the right reasons.”

Missoulian State Bureau reporter Charles S. Johnson can be reached at (406) 447-4066 or by email at

Copyright 2015 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(9) Comments

  1. montananurse
    Report Abuse
    montananurse - May 13, 2013 7:53 am
    The Republicans legislators continue to alienate.
  2. archangel
    Report Abuse
    archangel - May 10, 2013 8:34 am
    The Republican majority passed asinine legislation, which is why the responsible governor vetoed so many bills. They deserved to be vetoed. At least he used a pen, and not a branding iron.
  3. montanamuralist
    Report Abuse
    montanamuralist - May 10, 2013 8:31 am
    Republican Potter Party people are not apt to compromise. Compromise means both sides have good points to make and one reason that Montana voters elected a Democrat as Gov and a Potter Party legislature was to say COOPERATE. If you want to pass destructive legislation that hurts the most vulnerable of us and swerves your corporate masters, don't whine if the gov vetoes it. You will whine though and hopefully Montana voters are watching and will act accordingly in the next election.
  4. Gadfly
    Report Abuse
    Gadfly - May 09, 2013 6:01 pm
    It is a real good sign that the Governor is being criticized by this legislature off the deep it to put it mild, bat sh-- crazy to put it accurately. Keep on vetoing! Need a pen?
  5. Readneck
    Report Abuse
    Readneck - May 09, 2013 10:31 am
    The problem is that the Republican leadership is not "ready for prime time".
  6. DoItRight
    Report Abuse
    DoItRight - May 09, 2013 7:25 am
    As he should.
  7. DoItRight
    Report Abuse
    DoItRight - May 09, 2013 7:25 am
    How arrogant for Bruce Tutvedt to think that Gov Steve Bullock should act like Marc Racicot. Racicot presided over the destruction of Montana’s rock-solid businesses, turned a blind eye to massive health and environmental damage, and was a prostitute for Wall Street.

    We elected Steve Bullock because he was NOT Marc Racicot.
  8. dsrobins
    Report Abuse
    dsrobins - May 08, 2013 2:34 pm
    Republicans and tea baggers are welcome to choke on Governor Bullock's vetoes. If they pass bad legislation, they can expect more vetoes.
  9. walter12
    Report Abuse
    walter12 - May 08, 2013 7:10 am
    Our dear governor is a Democrat, he is a loyal follower of Obama, therefore, he cannot help vetoeing things that he, personally, does not like.
Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian ( may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Search our events calendar