Grizzly committee want full picture of Yellowstone bears' diet before delisting

2012-12-12T20:15:00Z 2014-10-03T14:24:10Z Grizzly committee want full picture of Yellowstone bears' diet before delistingBy ROB CHANEY of the Missoulian missoulian.com
December 12, 2012 8:15 pm  • 

To ensure they’ve got the best look at how well grizzly bears can endure in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, researchers want a full picture of the predators’ diet before another attempt to remove them from endangered species protection.

The Interagency Grizzly Bear Committee hopes to convince the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals it was justified in delisting the big bears from the federal Endangered Species Act, despite concerns that declining whitebark pine food supplies threatened the bears’ survival. At the committee’s winter meeting in Missoula on Wednesday, members reviewed a plan that could have a new delisting proposal ready by the end of 2013.

“The 9th Circuit doesn’t believe we adequately explained how the decline of whitebark pine will affect grizzly populations,” said Chris Servheen of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Grizzlies historically have fed on whitebark pinecone nuts, but the trees have suffered greatly from fungal disease and mountain pine bark beetle infestations. Around Yellowstone National Park, the bears also feed on cutthroat trout, carrion and army cutworm moths. All of those sources also have undergone changes in recent years.

“So we decided to take a little more holistic look at things,” said Frank van Manen, a U.S. Geological Survey scientist who’s heading up the grizzly bear food synthesis study. “What this is all about is caloric intake for bears.”

The new study should be done by next October. That could trigger a new delisting proposal by early 2014.

While the appeals court focused on whitebark pine research, van Manen said the bears appear to switch frequently from one bountiful food source to another. Whitebark pine nuts have good and bad years even in healthy forests, so the bears can’t entirely depend on them. Furthermore, grizzlies in the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem between Interstate 90 and Glacier National Park haven’t had whitebark pine nuts to eat for nearly 30 years, since the fungal disease killed most of those trees.

So far, biologists have identified 157 plants and 30 animals that grizzlies eat occasionally or frequently. Some bears feed mainly on meat, while others are nearly vegetarian.

In recent years, the Yellowstone area has seen increases in its army cutworm populations. It’s also seen much of its cutthroat trout population crash as lake trout have invaded Yellowstone Lake, where many of the cutthroats spawn. And the reintroduction of gray wolves has drastically changed the behavior of elk, deer and bison in the park. All those things change the mix of food that grizzlies depend on, van Manen said.

The Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem grizzly population has been growing somewhat less than 2 percent a year. It now numbers about 600 animals. That’s not as fast as the Northern Continental Divide bears, which have been expanding at 3 percent or better recently to more than 1,000. In both cases, the bears have been moving out of wilderness habitat and into surrounding farms, ranches and even towns.

Much of the IGBC’s working time on Wednesday went to updates on education programs that teach people in those areas how to deal with grizzlies eating their grain or bird feeders. The expanding populations have convinced many on the committee that the bears no longer be considered a threatened species under the federal Endangered Species Act.

As the numbers grow, so have the number of human-bear conflicts, especially in those fringe areas outside the wilderness and national parks. That’s increased pressure on land managers to have new ways of dealing with problem bears. But it’s also seen as a reason to maintain federal protections by some bear advocates, who fear delisting would irreparably reverse the bears’ progress.

Reporter Rob Chaney can be reached at 523-5382 or at rchaney@missoulian.com.

Copyright 2015 missoulian.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(1) Comments

  1. Bittersweet
    Report Abuse
    Bittersweet - December 12, 2012 9:27 pm
    "The bears also feed on cutthroat trout, carrion and army cutworm moths. All of those sources also have undergone changes in recent years.".......Interesting. No mention that another of the Grizzlies food sources has also undergone (drastic) changes over the last decade in the GYA. Elk calves. Prior to the introduction of the wolf, Grizzlies were the top predator on calf elk in the spring though mid summer. I bet you can guess who the new "top dog" is. Yes, avaliability of carrion has changed as well during this time period. Thousands of wolf killed elk mean thousands of carcass for bears to feed on.....initially that is...when the elk were plentiful. So that brings up this question. As the elk herd has been reduced by approx 75% (depending on which counts you tally) is the amount of carrion available to bears less, more or maybe about equal to whast was available when elk herds were more plentiful prior to introduction of the wolf in this area over a decade and a half ago? Just something to ponder.
Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on Missoulian.com

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian (Missoulian.com) may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in Missoulian.com's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on missoulian.com.

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick