Group sues over logging project in Kootenai National Forest

2013-10-02T18:00:00Z 2014-01-05T06:40:24Z Group sues over logging project in Kootenai National Forest

A timber sale in the Kootenai National Forest faces a court challenge for allegedly failing to protect a small population of grizzly bears.

The Alliance for the Wild Rockies filed the lawsuit in Missoula’s U.S. District Court office on Tuesday. The Helena-based group charges the Pilgrim timber sale would open 50 miles of roads in the Cabinet Ranger District, where fewer than 50 grizzlies live. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service population target is 100 bears.

“The Fish and Wildlife Service has declared that ‘(i)f human-related disturbances such as road use or timber harvest continue in preferred habitats for extended periods of time, historical bear use of the area may be lost.’ “ AWR director Michael Garrity said in an email. “But instead of refraining from logging and road-building in occupied grizzly bear habitat until the bear shows signs of recovery – or at least stabilization – the Forest Service has just approved another road-building and commercial logging project in occupied bear habitat: the Pilgrim Creek Project. Obviously the Forest Service isn’t doing its job to recover the grizzlies in the Cabinet-Yaak, so unfortunately, we have no choice but to take them to court to force the agency to follow the law.”

The project would log or burn 1,434 acres in the Kootenai National Forest, including 898 acres of clearcuts. It also plans to use helicopters for prescribed burning of another 3,250 acres in the Huckleberry Mountain and Lone Cliff Smeads inventoried roadless areas, which Garrity said was also occupied bear habitat.

The sale would need 4.7 miles of new permanent road, 47 miles of road reconstruction and 1.1 miles of temporary road building.

U.S. Forest Service officials were on furlough because of a national budget dispute and not available for comment.

“The target population for recovery of the Cabinet-Yaak grizzly bears is 100 bears,” Garrity said. “Not only are populations less than half that needed ensure a genetically stable population, they are in decline. The agency is blatantly ignoring its own scientific evidence and these projects would only have accelerated the loss of this population of grizzlies.”

Reporter Rob Chaney can be reached at 523-5382 or at

Copyright 2015 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(3) Comments

  1. gadflyohsofly
    Report Abuse
    gadflyohsofly - October 03, 2013 9:02 am
    When I was a little boy I would go to work with my uncle building logging roads. As the bucket of the excavator sunk into the earth, I watched on several occasions bears, spotted owls and lynx on the adjacent hill sides just fall over dead....
    No not really. But what is true, is that I would come hunt these areas several years later and find the abundance of wildlife to be much greater because of the opened up forest providing more grasses.
  2. RPT
    Report Abuse
    RPT - October 03, 2013 3:10 am
    The Endangered Species Act is the engine of social change being used by environmental elitists to destroy rural America. The wildlife that they pretend to care so much about are nothing more than tools of conquest to them.
    The unwitting allies of these destructive change agents are the uninformed urban masses who add their political clout to the big bucks of elitist foundations to arm this War against the West.

    There are many species on the endangered list but most of the attention and money goes to just a few of them and those are either fish or predators. This is because fish and predators:

    excite the public imagination more and are therefore good fundraisers and sales creatures for preservation.
    can lock up more land because they have large habitat requirements.
    The rest of the species (like the grizzly bear ) on the list are mostly ignored until necessary to use them to stop some specific project.

  3. Jacob
    Report Abuse
    Jacob - October 02, 2013 9:36 pm
    And yet grizzlies survive just fine in heavily human and automobile trafficked areas such as glacier and Yellowstone, the swan valley, north fork of the flathead, etc....
Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian ( may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Search our events calendar