Group urging Schweitzer to reconsider decision to forgo U.S. Senate run

2013-07-18T20:30:00Z 2013-07-22T06:46:31Z Group urging Schweitzer to reconsider decision to forgo U.S. Senate runMissoulian State Bureau
July 18, 2013 8:30 pm  • 

HELENA – The group that led the movement to draft former Gov. Brian Schweitzer to run for the U.S. Senate now wants him to reconsider his decision to forgo the race.

On Saturday, Schweitzer told reporters he had decided not to run for the Senate because he wants to remain in Montana.

Spearheading the effort is the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, based in Washington, D.C. The group said its “Draft Brian Schweitzer” effort recruited more than 600 Montana volunteers, raised more than $48,000 and gathered nearly 4,000 in-state supporters and 23,000 others nationally.

“Conversations are happening at a very high level and organizing is happening at a very grass-roots level about urging Brian to reconsider,” said Adam Green, co-founder of PCCC.

There has been no indication from Schweitzer or those closest to him that he is reconsidering his decision not to run for the Senate.

Green provided quotes from seven Montanans urging Schweitzer to change his mind.

“I am devastated that Schweitzer won’t run,” said one of them, Rebecca Harris Kotula of Missoula. “While I sympathize with Gov. Schweitzer’s preference to remain in Montana, I resent that the will of Montana for him to run (practically unchallenged) to represent Montana in the U.S. Senate is not enough to move his conscience. That leaves Montana and the nation vulnerable to yet another Republican member of Congress.”

Schweitzer had been gearing up to run, before telling reporters Saturday morning that he didn’t want to seek the Senate seat being vacated by longtime U.S. Sen. Max Baucus.

“I’m a doer,” Schweitzer said on Saturday. “I’m used to being in charge of things, getting things done. Unfortunately, the U.S. Senate is a place where things die.”

Copyright 2015 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(5) Comments

  1. sportscaster
    Report Abuse
    sportscaster - July 19, 2013 4:03 pm
    Keep it up, Schweitzer loves the attention and having people beg him to run. - Bill Schwanke
  2. stevenr406
    Report Abuse
    stevenr406 - July 19, 2013 2:50 pm
    Being a "doer" is something to be respected. Take a look at Clinton and Jimmy. Both have made significant impacts rather than trying to remain in the political game. Although I would have been proud to have him represent our state at the national level, I can't wait to see what he can accomplish for the good of the Treasure State, as he has proved to be a knowledgeable and reasonable individual with a mind toward bettering the lives of Montanans.
  3. Roger
    Report Abuse
    Roger - July 19, 2013 11:55 am
    Allow the man to live his life as he wants to - a lot of Montanans would be reluctant to leave the state to live in a horrible place like Washington DC.
  4. walter12
    Report Abuse
    walter12 - July 19, 2013 8:16 am
    For those thousands of Missoulians who are ignorant of the politics of today, this Progressive Change Compaign Committee is a front name for an arch leftist group out of DC that is closely alligned with Obama and his people.
  5. idiot state
    Report Abuse
    idiot state - July 19, 2013 6:56 am
    Wow Rebecca, get a grip. Some people have lives, interests, goals that don't involve politics. Instead of having resentment (seriously?) against someone who's decided (for whatever reason) not to run, maybe reevaluate your values and reassess what's important in life. If it's just politics/defeating Republicans, you've got some issues...
Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian ( may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick