The Montana Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a case about land-use regulation near Whitefish on Friday, April 11, at the University of Montana.

The session will start at 9:30 a.m. in the George and Jane Dennison Theatre with an introduction to the case. Oral arguments will be 40 minutes for both the appellants and appellees. Hosted by the UM School of Law, the session is free and open to the public.

This case arises from long-term issues between the city of Whitefish and Flathead County regarding land-use regulation in a 2-mile-wide “donut” surrounding Whitefish city limits. In this case, the district court invalidated a 2011 city referendum that repealed a city-county resolution on the subject.

The city appealed, arguing that the post-election challenge to the referendum was filed too late, the district court erred when it determined that the resolution was an administrative act that was not repealable through the referendum process, and the effect of the repeal of the referendum should be to return the city and county to a 2005 agreement under which the city had zoning and planning jurisdiction for the “donut.”

The case is titled “Lyle Phillips, Anne Dee Reno, Turner Askew and Ben Whitten, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. City of Whitefish, Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff, and Appellant, and the Board of Commissioners of Flathead County, Defendant, Third-Party Defendant and Appellee, and Dan Weinberg and Ed McGrew, individually and on behalf of Let Whitefish Vote, a ballot committee lawfully organized under the laws of Montana; Mary Person and Marilyn R. Nelson, Intervenors and Appellants.”

​Reach the Missoulian newsroom at @missoulian, at newsdesk@missoulian.com or at (406) 523-5240

More from missoulian.com

(1) comment

Leadfoot

Who, What, Where, When, Why. Clear as mud, as usual. There is an argument between the city of Whitefish and Flathead County regarding land-use regulation in a 2-mile-wide “donut” surrounding Whitefish city limits. What is the argument? Which one does not want to allow hiking trails, etc. Impossible to determine from the article. It would be nice to know. Perhaps would increase local interest in hearing the two sides at UM.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.