Medical marijuana provider rejects post-conviction plea offer

2012-10-25T09:41:00Z 2014-04-07T19:27:18Z Medical marijuana provider rejects post-conviction plea offerBy EVE BYRON Independent Record missoulian.com
October 25, 2012 9:41 am  • 

HELENA — In an unorthodox move, U.S. Attorney Michael Cotter is offering to dismiss six of the eight marijuana charges that a jury convicted Christopher Williams of on Sept. 27, but Williams is refusing to take the deal.

Due to mandatory minimum sentencing on four of the charges — which involved having a gun during the commission of a drug crime — Williams is facing between 82 and 85 years in prison.

In a letter sent to Anthony Gallagher, the chief federal defender, on Oct. 11, Cotter says that he’s willing to drop one count of manufacturing marijuana, two counts of possession with intent to distribute the drug and three counts of possession of a firearm during a drug trafficking offense if Williams will agree to waive his right to appeal the conviction and upcoming sentencing.

“Such a resolution would allow Mr. Williams to argue for and receive a total sentence of as little as 10 years between Counts I and V,” Cotter wrote. “Mr. Williams received a fair trial that will be upheld on appellate review. This offer is extended as a last effort by my office to treat Mr. Williams in a reasonable, sufficient and fair manner that will vindicate the federal interest in this case.”

The two remaining counts are conspiracy to grow and distribute marijuana, and possession of a firearm during a drug trafficking offense. The conspiracy involved his former medical marijuana business partners Chris Lindsey, Dan Nichols, Thomas Daubert and the Flor family.

All of those people agreed to plead guilty in exchange for a lower sentence. Daubert is on probation for five years, members of the Flor family received sentences between two and five years; Lindsey and Nichols are awaiting sentencing.

But in a letter to the Independent Record, Williams wrote that he will reject what he calls “the new compromise” as he has with all other proposed plea bargains. He argues that this case isn’t just about medical marijuana — U.S. District Court Judge Dana Christensen prohibited discussion of Montana’s state law during Williams’ trial — but is about people being in charge of their government rather than the other way around.

“I have decided to fight the federal government, because for me not defending the things that I know are right is dishonorable,” Williams wrote. “Every citizen has a responsibility to fight for what is right, even if it seems like the struggle will be lost.

“It is the power of the people to control this government that is supposed to protect us. If we shun this struggle, this government will control us instead of protecting us.”

The offer expires Oct. 31.

Michael Donahoe, a senior litigator for the Federal Defenders of Montana who is Williams’ attorney, didn’t outright dismiss the offer in court documents he filed this week.

However, he noted that in his 28 years as an attorney, he’s never seen a post-judgment verdict offer like this proposed, under which the potential sentence decreases by about 86 percent. He called it “unorthodox.”

“Generosity, maybe; but it may be equally true that the government has misgivings about this case going to the Court of Appeals,” Donahoe wrote. “Although this can be viewed as a magnanimous gesture by the United States, it also serves to acknowledge that even the United States Attorney for this district doesn’t view Mr. Williams as deserving of 82 plus years in prison.”

Instead, he’s asking Christensen to order the release of Williams from custody while appealing the conviction to the Ninth Circuit on a variety of issues.

One point Donahoe will raise is that he believes the government has a history of bringing gun charges against medical marijuana distributors, but never meant to prosecute those; instead, he argues that it was done in order to coerce plea bargains rather than challenge federal statutes.

“We know this for two reasons. First, because the government readily agreed to dismiss the firearms counts for virtually every other medical marijuana defendant in those cases where fire-arms violations had been charged,” Donahoe wrote. “And second, because insofar as (Williams’) ‘conspiracy’ is concerned, every other defendant had no real choice but to plead guilty in exchange for the firearms charges being dropped.

“Given the government’s conduct here that was a false choice inspired by an abusive exercise of government power, considering that it was the government’s reckless decision to change its medical marijuana policy that was the first cause of all these problems.”

The change Donahoe alludes to involves statements made by U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder in March 2009, who said the Justice Department no longer would raid medical marijuana dispensaries that are legally created under states’ law. That statement was followed up by the so-called “Ogden memo” in October 2009, in which Deputy Attorney General David Ogden said the same thing.

However, in June 2011 the “Cole memo” was issued, and Deputy Attorney General James Cole instructed federal prosecutors that people in the business of cultivating, selling or distributing marijuana are violating the Controlled Substances Act, regardless of state law. Cole said that abiding by state and local laws is not a defense to breaking federal laws.

Donahoe notes that if Williams is released from prison, he has a place to stay with a friend in Bozeman and a job awaiting him. He adds that Williams shouldn’t be considered a flight risk and could have his movements electronically monitored.

Donahoe also believes that there’s a good chance the conviction will be reversed.

Federal prosecutors are opposed to releasing Williams, who is incarcerated in the Crossroads Correctional Facility in Shelby.

Copyright 2015 missoulian.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(4) Comments

  1. Rob C
    Report Abuse
    Rob C - October 25, 2012 4:27 pm
    Nothing from the usual crowd posted here either. This man is a true patriot fighting an out of control government at the risk of his own freedom. Glad to see that some people are willing to do whats right, even if its hard.
  2. just say now
    Report Abuse
    just say now - October 25, 2012 3:28 pm
    Think Jury Nullification! Anyone who is on a jury in a marijuana case should refuse to convict. Send a message to the government that marijuana laws are unjust
    You don't have to wait until the next election to be heard. The juror has the last word!
  3. Shenanigans
    Report Abuse
    Shenanigans - October 25, 2012 3:18 pm
    It's pathetic how the only person with any integrity involved in the case of US v. Williams, is Mr. Williams. He is nothing short of a patriot for standing for the principles this Nation supposedly holds dear.

    End the war on peaceful Americans who are merely exercising their rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, which are guaranteed by the 1st, 2nd and 4th amendments. All you Tea Party fanatics bleating about big government tyranny and the sanctity of free will and free markets, Chris Williams' plight at the hands of the Phederal Corptocracy is your call to action. But will you silently watch him be crucified?
  4. Jose79845
    Report Abuse
    Jose79845 - October 25, 2012 2:39 pm
    Finally someone with a backbone to stand up to Adolph-Eric Holder-Hitler, et al. These plea bargains are so disparate that they are allowing the government to continue their nonsense.
Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on Missoulian.com

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian (Missoulian.com) may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in Missoulian.com's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on missoulian.com.

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick