Groups testify in support of cutting Montana tax on business equipment

2013-01-23T12:07:00Z 2013-01-24T05:49:12Z Groups testify in support of cutting Montana tax on business equipmentBy CHARLES S. JOHNSON Missoulian State Bureau missoulian.com

HELENA – Business groups turned out Wednesday to support a Republican senator’s bill to further reduce the state’s property tax on business equipment.

No one showed up at the Senate Taxation Committee to oppose Senate Bill 96 by Sen. Bruce Tutvedt, R-Kalispell.

It would lower the property tax rate to 1.5 percent on equipment valued at between $3 million and up to $10 million. If a business had $15 million worth of equipment, it would be taxed at a rate of 1.5 percent for the first $10 million and 3 percent for the remaining $5 million.

The current law taxes equipment valued at up to $3 million at 1.5 percent. The rate is 3 percent for property valued at more than $3 million. Business equipment valued at $20,000 or less is not taxed.

SB96 would cost the state $7.2 million from the state general fund in fiscal 2015 to reimburse schools, local governments and the university system for lost property tax revenue. In future years, the cost would be about $5 million annually.

Democratic Gov. Steve Bullock favors a different approach, one that would eliminate this tax for businesses with equipment worth less than $100,000.

In presenting his bill, Tutvedt said, “This is a jobs bill. This is to incentivize small companies.”

It would help attract businesses using expensive equipment such as gun manufacturers, printing presses and lumber mills, he said.

Tutvedt said the proposed 1.5 percent tax rate for the first $10 million of value in his bill would make it as the same effective rate that is charged on homes.

In 2011, Tutvedt sponsored the law that lowered the tax to 1.5 percent from 3 percent for businesses with equipment valued $3 million or less.

The Legislature has steadily lowered Montana’s business equipment tax since 1989 when it dropped from 12 percent to 9 percent. Since then, it was reduced from 9 percent to 6 percent over time and then 6 percent to 3 percent. It was set to be eliminated if a certain economic trigger was hit, but the 2005 Legislature halted that and froze the tax at 3 percent.

Webb Brown of the Montana Chamber of Commerce supported the bill, saying the business equipment tax rate “is absolutely an important tax consideration” that businesses use in deciding whether to relocate or expand their existing operations.

Idaho is considering eliminating its business equipment tax, which would leave Montana standing alone among its neighboring states with such a tax, he said.

Riley Johnson of the Montana chapter of the National Federation of Independent Business said the bill wouldn’t directly help the very small businesses he represents. But he said small businesses need big businesses.

Cary Hegreberg of the Montana Contractors Association endorsed the bill, saying, “Our member companies have huge capital investment in equipment.”

Also backing the bill were representatives of the various agricultural groups.

“Any tax savings that farmers and ranchers see goes back into our local economies,” said Nichole Rolf of the Farm Bureau.

Sen. Sue Malek, D-Missoula, told Tutvedt she believes businesses want more than just lower tax rates to locate here. They also want good schools, good roads and other services, she said.

“When we continue to cut taxes – we’re still way down in average income – are we shooting ourselves in the foot by not building the kinds of communities our businesses need?” she asked.

Tutvedt said Montana has a good education system and one that will get better under a bill by Sen. Llew Jones, R-Conrad, and good communities.

The committee didn’t vote on Tutvedt’s bill.

Missoulian State Bureau reporter Charles S. Johnson can be reached at (406) 447-4066 or at chuck.johnson@lee.net.

Copyright 2015 missoulian.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(3) Comments

  1. denisewilliamskelley
    Report Abuse
    denisewilliamskelley - January 26, 2013 7:44 am
    If we don't eliminate this tax our neighboring states will be educating our children. If is long overdue the time to attract new businesses to Missoula and the State.
  2. gunner2
    Report Abuse
    gunner2 - January 24, 2013 8:31 am
    Bullock wants to eliminate the tax for only those businesses with less than $100 thousand in business equipment. That would help the mom & pops but wouldn't do anything for the real job creating small businesses.
  3. Dub
    Report Abuse
    Dub - January 23, 2013 2:24 pm
    Pretty wide gap---$10 million while Bullock wants $100 thousand.
Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on Missoulian.com

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian (Missoulian.com) may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in Missoulian.com's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on missoulian.com.

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Search our events calendar