Montana House narrowly endorses state database on health care costs

2013-03-07T23:00:00Z Montana House narrowly endorses state database on health care costs missoulian.com

HELENA – The Montana House Thursday narrowly endorsed a bill to create a statewide database on health care costs, which its supporters said will help the state manage and perhaps reduce rising health care costs.

“Health care costs are consuming more and more of our economic picture and we’re getting, in some respects, not what we pay for,” said Rep. Chuck Hunter, D-Helena, the sponsor of the bill. “(This) allows Montana to identify areas where there are wasteful health care spending and insight on how to manage health care plans.”

The House voted 54-46 to endorse House Bill 489, as 15 Republicans joined all 39 of the chamber’s Democrats to support the measure.

House members then forwarded HB489 to the House Appropriations Committee for further review. The committee will consider how the bill and its $1.7 million price-tag may fit into the state’s overall budget.

HB489 appropriates state money to build the database and operate it for the next two years – although the measure was amended to allow federal grants or other sources of money to fund the project, if possible.

The database would be compiled from medical claims information provided by health insurers and the state, which spends more than $1 billion a year on health care programs.

Hunter said the database would provide many types of information on health care costs.

For example, it could identify which providers charge consistently higher, or lower, fees for the same service, show how costs are shifted from one group of consumers to the other, or whether high-deductible insurance plans lead to less or more preventive care, he said.

“It allows us to analyze what’s really going on in health care … and allows us to get to what the root causes are (for increases),” Hunter said.

Opponents questioned whether the database would really lead to lower health care costs, but most said the government shouldn’t be involved in collecting such information.

“I’m concerned about my Social Security number being included in one more database,” said Rep. Mike Miller, R-Helmville.

Yet others asked how the state could expect to control health care costs if it doesn’t track and analyze its multimillion-dollar expenses, and said any successful private business would do the same.

“If you really believe government should be run like a business, you should support this bill,” said Rep. Rob Cook, R-Conrad. “These are the tools that a business uses to save money. You analyze costs, you track spending, and you make improvements in the system to save money.”

Missoulian State Bureau reporter Mike Dennison can be reached at 1-800-525-4920 or by email at mike.dennison@lee.net.

Copyright 2015 missoulian.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(2) Comments

  1. isecher
    Report Abuse
    isecher - March 10, 2013 8:58 am
    The price of medical services offered needs to be available to the consumer in advance. Many Americans pay as we go by choice or necessity and do not know in advance the breakdown of costs which vary widely. There are different charges for the same treatment based on age, gender, insured or uninsured. Pricing also varies widely between providers. Without pricing info clearly listed how can I intelligently shop around and make informed decisions about my care? Just as I expect the hamburger joint to show me the price of the burger and sides, I expect the medical providers to list the price of their services offered. This bill should include that mandate.
  2. Joseph From Missoula
    Report Abuse
    Joseph From Missoula - March 09, 2013 11:01 am
    This is a no-brainer. For just over 1 thousandth the cost of one year's healthcare costs, the state can get a handle on what we're paying for and who's gouging us. Check out Steven Brill's incredible article in Time Magazine about how our economy and our people are being strangled by healthcare costs and who is tightening the noose. The article is called: The Bitter Pill. It's online -- TIME.com -- and type Bitter Pill in the search.
Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on Missoulian.com

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian (Missoulian.com) may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in Missoulian.com's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on missoulian.com.

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Search our events calendar