Montana industries back bill to mediate disputed property values

2013-02-19T18:15:00Z 2013-02-19T20:14:01Z Montana industries back bill to mediate disputed property values

HELENA – Representatives of a number of Montana industries backed a bill Tuesday to allow property owners to go to mediation if they dispute the state Revenue Department’s assessed valuation of their property.

State Revenue Director Mike Kadas opposed the bill, saying Montana’s tax appeal process has been working “reasonably well for a long time.”

The bill sponsor, Sen. Fred Thomas, R-Stevensville, told the Senate Taxation Committee that mediation can take place now, but only if both the property owner and Revenue Department agree.

His Senate Bill 280 would authorize any property taxpayer who objects to the Revenue Department value to request mediation, which would then trigger it. The 2011 Legislature passed a similar bill, but former Gov. Brian Schweitzer vetoed it.

What happens now, he said, is businesses can appeal their valuation to the State Tax Appeal Board, then they can take it to District Court and finally to the Montana Supreme Court. While that happens, schools and local governments don’t have access to the protested property taxes for years until a decision is handed down.

The two sides would agree on an independent mediator who is not a state employee and possibly resolve these disputes much sooner, Thomas said. If the issues aren’t resolved in mediation, the taxpayer could go to District Court or STAB.

“Mediation is the wave of the future,” Thomas said. “I have used it in work.

Lining up to support the bill were representatives of the Montana Taxpayers Association, Century Link, Puget Sound Energy, Portland General Electric, Avista, Montana Petroleum Association, Montana County Treasurers Association, Montana Chamber of Comemrce, Montana Association of Realtors, Montana Association, MDU Resources and AT&T.

“We’re hoping to have a pace where everyone could sit down and resolve at least some of the issues without having to go to litigation,” said Nancy Schlepp, president of the Montana Taxpayers Association.”These cases are large and complex. Taxpayers have to fund and participate in at least two layers of appeals. It’s costly to citizens.”

Kadas was the lone opponent, predicting the system under SB280 would lengthen the process rather than shorten it.

He said STAB was created in 1973, after the 1972 Montana Constitution, and succeeded the state Board of Equalization, which began in 1923.

“The notion of a tax appeal board is very common,” Kadas said. “It is something that is used throughout the country. When we have areas that of particularly complex laws that are not the normal milk and potatoes kind of law, we have special courts to deal with them.”

As examples, he cited federal bankruptcy courts and Montana’s Water Court, Human Rights Commission and Montana Board of Labor Appeals.

By moving away from the State Tax Appeal Board, he said Montana would lose its expertise, efficiency and timeliness. Kadas said District Courts rarely have training in this kind of law.

SB280 also allows what Kadas called “forum shopping” where centrally assessed properties can find the court in which they have the most success.

He offered amendments to make it a mediation bill that the department could support.

“Fundamentally, if it isn’t broke, let’s not try to fix it,” the director said.

The committee didn’t take any immediate action on the bill.

Missoulian State Bureau reporter Charles S. Johnson can be reached at (406) 447-4066 or by email at

Copyright 2015 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian ( may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Missoulian Poll


Do you favor four-day school weeks?

View Results

Search our events calendar