Montana Senate panel tables gay protections bill

2015-01-30T13:45:00Z 2015-01-30T21:29:15Z Montana Senate panel tables gay protections billThe Associated Press The Associated Press
January 30, 2015 1:45 pm  • 

HELENA – All in one day, Montana lawmakers heard testimony, voted against and then tabled a bill that would provide protections for gay, lesbian, transgender and other people in the state.

Sen. Christine Kaufmann of Helena introduced Senate Bill 179 on Friday in the Senate Judiciary Committee. The openly lesbian Democrat told lawmakers Friday the world is changing and the law needs to keep up.

"This is adding to the human rights law people who are experiencing discrimination," she said. "It does not take liberties away from people."

Under the measure, the words "gender identity and expression and sexual orientation" would be added to the state's Human Rights Act. The act currently bans discrimination based on race, creed, religion, color, sex, physical or mental disability, age or national origin in situations such as housing or employment.

Supporters and opponents lined up to testify, with gay and transgender people telling lawmakers their stories.

Thousands of transgender people in the state face discrimination, said Shawn Francis of Bozeman.

"I'm afraid to stand in front of you today and tell you I'm transgender," Francis said. "I'm afraid to tell you how it feels to lose a job or to have to couch-surf for three months at a time because I can't find housing in my city. Something needs to change, and it needs to happen now."

But Dawnette Osen said that while God calls people to love one another, God does not call people to approve what she called "sinful acts."

"I can love them but not bake them a wedding cake," Osen said.

Bozeman Republican Sen. Jedediah Hinkle asked Kaufmann about instances in other states in which business owners refusing to bake wedding cakes for gay couples have been taken to court. "What safeguards do you propose, believe there will be, for people of faith who may disagree that would protect them from these types of lawsuits," he asked.

Kaufmann replied "people with businesses that personally want to discriminate? Should they be allowed not to serve a black person?"

The bill failed along party lines in the Republican-led committee by a 7-5 vote just after two hours of testimony.

Kaufmann said after the hearing that she wasn't too optimistic about the bill's chances based on the vote and opposing testimony, although she said it would have broader support on the Senate floor. "Some seem to be stuck while the world moves on," she said.

Three Montana cities – Bozeman, Helena and Missoula – along with Butte-Silver Bow County have passed similar anti-discrimination ordinances in the past four years.

Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(3) Comments

  1. Atheist Educator
    Report Abuse
    Atheist Educator - January 31, 2015 8:38 am
    Rez Kid, the Montana Code offers "special protection" to those who make the lifestyle choice to belong to a religion. How about we get rid of those "special protections too?"
  2. Rez Kid
    Report Abuse
    Rez Kid - January 30, 2015 3:35 pm
    Every minority,every special interest group, every gay & lesbian needs MORE special protections??? Don't think so. They already have enough laws in their favor, what more is needed?? Nothing. The only group that doesn't have tons of laws that give them special protections, advantages, etc. are straight, white, employed men.
    I'm sick of the term SOCIAL JUSTICE
  3. Greg Strandberg
    Report Abuse
    Greg Strandberg - January 30, 2015 2:51 pm
    Silver Bullet time? That'll leave us with 5, correct?
Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on Missoulian.com

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian (Missoulian.com) may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in Missoulian.com's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on missoulian.com.

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Missoulian Poll

Loading…

What was your favorite “Spock” episode of “Star Trek”?

View Results

Search our events calendar