Sporting groups to rally as Missoula legislator tries to blast land access bill

2013-02-14T09:00:00Z 2014-03-30T16:31:07Z Sporting groups to rally as Missoula legislator tries to blast land access billBy FRANCIS DAVIS Montana Standard
February 14, 2013 9:00 am  • 

BUTTE – A coalition of sporting groups from throughout the state is heading to Helena en masse Monday to rally for a bill that would allow access for corner crossings.

House Bill 235 – which failed in a House Judiciary Committee vote on Jan. 30 – revises trespass laws to allow for corner crossing through private land.

On Monday, the sponsor of the bill, Rep. Ellie Hill, D-Missoula, will try to blast it out of committee and onto the House floor. She needs 60 votes to do so.

The sportsmen and women will leave on buses from Billings, Bozeman, Butte, Great Falls, Livingston and Missoula. The buses from Missoula will leave from the Grant Creek Town Pump at 9:30 a.m. on Feb. 18, and are free of charge.

The state controls an estimated 1.3 millions acres of public land that can’t be accessed without owning adjacent land, getting permission from an adjacent landowner or trespassing, organizers said.

The Montana Sportsmen Alliance estimated that HB235 would allow access to 860,000 acres of public land. This would be done by allowing a person to step over the junction of four intersecting corners diagonally from one public parcel to another without stepping on the parcels of private land.

Opponents, including ranchers and farmers, contend the bill chips away at the rights of property owners. Opponents also believe the law is unnecessary because most landowners already allow sportsmen and women permission to cross their property. They also say that corners of properties aren’t so easily found, even with sophisticated GPS devices. Finally, the opponents contend, the issue is further complicated because corners often are fenced.

Sam Milodragovich of Butte, a member of the Montana Sportsmen Alliance, isn’t buying the argument of those who rejected HB235.

“Every single one of us fully respects private property rights,” Milodragovich said. “We also believe in the public access to wildlife. It belongs to all of us and we have to work together for a solution.”

Milodragovich, a wildlife biologist employed by NorthWestern Energy, also is a member of Skyline Sportsmen, and the Public Land-Water Access Association. Members of those groups, along with the Anaconda Sportsmen and the Montana Hunters and Anglers Action, have voiced support for HB235.

In essence, the sportsmen groups contend that the public has a right to access public land.

“One of the things that is going on is there are so many bills assaulting the things that we hold dear,” Milodragovich said. “They are chipping away at what we believe are our rights. Wildlife is held in a trust by the state.”

The Montana Sportsmen Alliance sent a memo to the Montana House Judiciary Committee that was prepared by J. Devlan Geddes and Spencer C. Thomas, attorneys from Bozeman, confirming the constitutionality of the bill under state and federal law.

That memo did not sway the committee.

Rep. Krayton Kerns, R-Laurel, initially co-sponsored the bill, but withdrew his support during the committee vote because of concerns over the legality of the bill. He also said he will resist the motion to blast the bill onto the floor of the House.

In an email to the Standard, Kerns wrote, “There are two other bills in the process, HB404 and HB440 which offer a free-market solution to the question and I think they have real merits of addressing concerns of both sides of this issue. Action will be taken on them over the next few days.”

HB404 would provide money for the block management program, while HB440 would dedicate hunting license fee money to easement procurement.

Copyright 2015 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(5) Comments

  1. Aberdeen
    Report Abuse
    Aberdeen - February 14, 2013 3:47 pm
    Any bets that the private property onwers involved in the "corner" issue treat the public lands like their own personal playgrounds with out the rest of the public "riff-raff" to infringe on it for hunting, hiking, etc? How about leasing out their lands to rich hunters whio then go on to Public lands without competition?
  2. montanamuralist
    Report Abuse
    montanamuralist - February 14, 2013 12:55 pm
    I just want a say who comes on my property and for what purpose...even a corner of it. That does not seem like rocket science...unless you have no regard for people to have the right to own property...sheesh..
  3. D
    Report Abuse
    D - February 14, 2013 11:16 am
    The State needs to use imminent domain and buy the easements from the property owners. Siimple as that.
  4. mtjh
    Report Abuse
    mtjh - February 14, 2013 10:31 am
    Providing access to Public Lands is not the obligation of private property owners it is the Government,s responsibility .We all pay taxes for public land use and maintenance, only I pay taxes on my property and only I will use it!
  5. Dub
    Report Abuse
    Dub - February 14, 2013 9:39 am
    This bill will set landowner/public us cooperation back to the days when everything was locked up. First, to have someone from Missoula propose anything that affects land owners east of the mountains is on shaky ground to start with and secondly to have someone like of Sam Milodragovich speaking up creates a political divide (extreme liberal vs conservative) that will stifle any meaningful dialog. Mr. Milodragovich, from Butte, is a bully and has no respect for private property rights. This should bill is just one more step in the attempt to eliminate any decisions made regarding game management by the land owners. Yes, we all own the game but the landowners feed and water and care for their fields and does not put any obligation on them to provide access, especially if there is a 4 on the license plate.
Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian ( may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Search our events calendar