Montana oil leasing dispute heads to federal court

2013-05-23T22:30:00Z Montana oil leasing dispute heads to federal courtThe Associated Press The Associated Press
May 23, 2013 10:30 pm  • 

BILLINGS – A dispute over greenhouse gases from oil and gas drilling will head to federal court in Montana as attorneys for the government and the industry face off against environmentalists who say too little is being done to reduce emissions that contribute to climate change.

The legal quarrel was scheduled to land in court on Friday, amid increasing efforts by environmentalists to target emissions from burning fossil fuels and the release of methane and other greenhouse gases during the production of the fuels.

The debate over whether those activities are having a significant effect has gained importance as domestic oil and gas production booms.

In the Montana case, three groups want U.S. District Judge Sam Haddon to cancel Bureau of Land Management oil and gas leases covering almost 80,000 acres. BLM spokeswoman Kristen Lenhardt said there has been no drilling activity yet on the 120 leases in dispute.

The groups, including the Montana Environmental Information Center, argue that the government should have forced companies to reduce emissions from oil and gas fields as a condition of leasing. Sources of emissions include leaks, venting of excess natural gas, and exhaust from equipment used to drill for, process and transport oil and gas.

“The Bureau of Land Management should consider mandatory measures to keep methane out of the atmosphere and in the pipeline where it belongs for homes, schools and businesses,” said Erik Schlenker-Goodrich with the Western Environmental Law Center, who is representing the plaintiffs.

The BLM counters that it considered greenhouse gas emissions prior to issuing the leases found the gases to be insignificant on a global scale. Because those emissions are “infinitesimal” compared to other human activities, reducing them would have little effect on climate change, the agency said.

“Even an order prohibiting all development of the leases would reduce global annual (greenhouse gas) emissions by an insignificant amount,” BLM attorneys wrote in a motion asking Haddon to dismiss the case.

Industry groups including the American Petroleum Institute and Western Energy Alliance have intervened on the side of the government, saying environmentalists cannot prove any specific harm was suffered from the lease sales.

Kathleen Sgamma with the energy alliance said the lawsuit is part of a broader campaign against the industry, even as increased production of natural gas has displaced more polluting fuels such as coal. She added that hobbling oil and gas development in Montana would hurt economic growth with little benefit in terms of reduced emissions.

The dispute dates to 2008, when the Montana Environmental Information Center challenged a large lease sale that included oil and gas parcels in Montana.

The government later agreed to suspend the leases and further analyze the environmentalists’ claims. The leases were re-issued in 2010, prompting the lawsuit now before Haddon.

Companies sometimes wait years to drill depending on market conditions and where leases are located.

Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(3) Comments

  1. walter12
    Report Abuse
    walter12 - May 24, 2013 7:12 am
    Greenhouse gases, how absurd and stupid.
  2. onemontana
    Report Abuse
    onemontana - May 23, 2013 11:55 pm
    A lawyer with a briefcase can steal more than a thousand men with guns.
    Mario Puzo
  3. mtmike
    Report Abuse
    mtmike - May 23, 2013 11:39 pm
    MEIC should be forced to pay damages when this ridiculous, obfuscatory lawsuit is rightly thrown out.. They used to be reasonable but that was 20 years ago. Now they are the home of otherwise unemployable surplus lawyers.
Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian ( may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Search our events calendar