Montana Supreme Court upholds Myran homicide conviction

2012-11-29T16:00:00Z 2012-11-29T16:14:51Z Montana Supreme Court upholds Myran homicide convictionThe Associated Press The Associated Press
November 29, 2012 4:00 pm  • 

BOZEMAN — The Montana Supreme Court denied a Three Forks man's efforts to have his deliberate homicide conviction overturned because jurors were reminded that under state law being voluntarily intoxicated does not excuse conduct that otherwise would be found to be a crime.

Jay Myran, 41, was found guilty of shooting Gayle Brewster in May 2009 and burning her body in a barrel. He was sentenced to 120 years in prison without the possibility of parole.

His attorney, Colin Stephens, argued the law disallowing intoxication as a defense is unconstitutional, especially in cases where the defendant argues he acted with negligence.

Myran testified that he had been drinking with Brewster on May 12, 2009, and estimated he'd consumed at least an 18-pack of beer that day. Myran's friend and his son testified that Myran and Brewster had argued.

Myran's son testified that his father had said several times: "Let's kill Gayle." The boy said he dismissed it as "drunk talk," although Myran had made similar statements for weeks, court records said.

At some point, Myran took out a shotgun and later loaded it and raised it toward Brewster. Myran's son testified that Brewster walked toward Myran, put the gun in her mouth and said, "Do it, cowboy." The gun went off.

The boy acknowledged telling Gallatin County detectives that his father put the gun in Brewster's mouth. Myran testified that the gun went off when Brewster grabbed it.

The next morning, Myran and his then 14-year-old son started burning Brewster's body in a burn barrel, testimony indicated.

The boy pleaded guilty to misdemeanor tampering with evidence and received a probationary sentence in July 2010 in exchange for cooperating with prosecutors in the case against his father.

Myran's defense was that he was guilty not of deliberate homicide, but of negligent homicide based on his level of intoxication and reckless behavior with a gun. Such a conviction would result in a sentence of up to 20 years in prison.

Myran's attorney argued the state law and thus, the jury instruction, prevented jurors from considering Myran's theory of defense. Stephens also argued that although the U.S. Supreme Court had ruled the law does not violate the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution, it violates Montana's Constitution.

The state argued that Myran fully presented his defense regarding intoxication and negligent homicide to the jury and that he failed to establish that the state constitution provides a greater right to present a defense than the U.S. Constitution.

The Supreme Court, in a Nov. 8 ruling, agreed with the state, noting that Montana's due process clause is identical to that in the U.S. Constitution.

Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian ( may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Search our events calendar