Montana wolf population up 15 percent in 2011

2012-02-29T23:45:00Z 2012-03-07T20:53:09Z Montana wolf population up 15 percent in 2011The Associated Press The Associated Press
February 29, 2012 11:45 pm  • 

HELENA – The number of wolves in Montana increased by 15 percent to at least 653 animals despite the state’s efforts to reduce the population with an extended hunting season, state wildlife officials said Wednesday.

Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks officials said 87 more wolves were counted at the end of 2011 than were in the state a year before. There were 130 verified packs and 39 breeding pairs counted, also increases from 2010 numbers.

Ranchers concerned about wolves attacking their livestock and hunters who blame wolves for a decline big game say that’s way too many predators and the population must be reduced.

FWP authorized a quota of 220 wolves in the first hunt since Congress passed legislation last year removing endangered species protections for the gray wolf in the Northern Rocky Mountains except for Wyoming. That state’s policy was considered harmful to the species’ survival.

FWP had aimed to reduce Montana’s wolf population to 425 animals with the hunting season. But only 165 wolves were killed, or 75 percent of the quota, despite the end of the hunting season being extended from the end of December to mid-February.

Also, fewer wolves were killed last year by wildlife officials responding to livestock predation complaints than in 2010, FWP said.

Montana still aims to reduce the number of wolves and will examine additional ways to do so, director Joe Maurier said in a statement.

Those options could include allowing hunters to kill more than one wolf, purchase more than one hunting license, or use electronic calls, he said. Officials could also allow trapping, increase the quota or extend the hunting season.

Some of the changes would require approval of the FWP commission, while others would need a change in state law.

“We’re committed to using our authority to responsibly manage Montana’s wolf population while addressing conflicts with livestock and other wildlife populations,” Maurier said. “We’re also committed to allowing hunters, who are showing a real interest in pursuing wolves, to become even more involved in Montana’s approach to wolf management.”

The recovery goal for wolves across the northern Rocky Mountains was set at a minimum of 30 breeding pairs and minimum of 300 individual wolves for at least three consecutive years, a mark achieved in 2002.

Montana’s wolf plan sets a minimum of 15 breeding pairs and 150 wolves. Conservation groups have criticized Montana and Idaho’s wolf plans, saying both set the minimum too low for a sustainable, interconnected population.

Those groups filed lawsuits challenging the U.S. government’s removal of wolves from the endangered species list, and U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy had blocked removal of wolf protections until last May.

That’s when Congress passed legislation delisting the wolves and turning management of the animal over to Idaho and Montana, allowing those states to hold hunts.

Idaho hunters have shot 237 wolves and have trapped 97 more as of Wednesday, according to the Idaho Fish and Game website.

Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian ( may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Search our events calendar