Plan for last of Upper Clark Fork restoration funds made public

2012-09-26T21:30:00Z 2014-01-28T06:21:36Z Plan for last of Upper Clark Fork restoration funds made publicBy ROB CHANEY of the Missoulian missoulian.com
September 26, 2012 9:30 pm  • 

DEER LODGE – The outline for spending $65.5 million restoring the upper Clark Fork River basin got its first public review Wednesday.

Projects range from $2.4 million for Milltown State Park facilities east of Missoula to $20 million for buying water rights to increase the amount of water for fish in the Clark Fork and its tributaries.

“I feel like there should be a drum roll going on,” said Carol Fox of the Montana Department of Justice’s Natural Resource Damage Program. “These proposals merit a deep look, not a superficial one.”

After 10 years of doling out annual grant awards, NRDP has opted to create a long-range plan for spending its remaining bank account. The money, from a court settlement covering a century’s worth of mining damage to the 325,000-acre region, will take up to 20 years to spend. The Upper Clark Fork Remediation and Restoration Advisory Council got first crack at the proposals.

“This is the home stretch of a long process,” council chairman Bill Rossbach said. “We had 80 proposed projects. But we haven’t had a look at the specifics until now.”

The $65.5 million was split, $45.6 million for aquatic projects and $19.9 million for terrestrial ones. About 10 percent of each pot will go to recreation enhancements. The rest goes to things like fish screens, conservation easements and habitat improvement.

Rossbach said one major decision the council made was to require all proposals have a direct impact on damaged lands or their surroundings. That meant ideas like an $8 million pedestrian bridge across the Clark Fork near Bonner did not make the final cut, because it wouldn’t improve the river.

But a proposal to remove a diversion dam on the Blackfoot River in Bonner worth $50,000 was included. While it’s most obvious benefit was to boaters floating down the river, it also would make it easier for fish to travel.

The aquatic funds spread across 12 watersheds, including the Little Blackfoot River, Flint Creek and Warm Springs Creek. Doug Martin of the NRDP explained that making improvements on a place like Brown’s Gulch near Rocker would improve the ability of a genetically pure population of westslope cutthroat trout to stock the main Clark Fork. That helps restore the whole river drainage to it’s pre-mining ecological vitality.

Terrestrial projects are slated for nine landscapes. On a map, they line a rough box cornered by Drummond, Garrison, Deer Lodge and Philipsburg. While Philipsburg is far from the mining wastes of Butte and Anaconda, it sits in a crucial wildlife crossing area that serves those other corners.

The complete plan can be found on the Internet at https://doj.mt.gov/lands.

The catalog of proposals will take public comment through Oct. 26. Gov. Brian Schweitzer may give final approval to the plan in December.

Reporter Rob Chaney can be reached at 523-5382 or at rchaney@missoulian.com.

Copyright 2015 missoulian.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on Missoulian.com

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian (Missoulian.com) may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in Missoulian.com's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on missoulian.com.

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Search our events calendar