Prosecutors: Crow defendants to keep most proceeds from billing scheme

2014-04-25T16:00:00Z 2014-07-13T04:02:01Z Prosecutors: Crow defendants to keep most proceeds from billing schemeThe Associated Press The Associated Press
April 25, 2014 4:00 pm  • 

BILLINGS (AP) — Defendants in a corruption case on a Montana American Indian reservation won't have to repay most of the money they received through a fraudulent billing scheme, federal prosecutors said Friday.

Seven defendants pleaded guilty or were convicted at trial after authorities said they diverted roughly $500,000 from tribal accounts while doing cultural monitoring work for the Crow Indian Tribe.

Prosecutors pursued the case only on behalf of the tribe — not the outside companies that sought the monitoring work. As a result, U.S. District Judge Susan Watters said in a recent order that the defendants could be held liable only for a combined $48,370 in direct losses to the tribe.

That means the defendants, including several members of the prominent Old Horn family, will keep most of the scheme's proceeds, prosecutors said.

Family patriarch Dale Old Horn was director of the tribe's preservation office from 2005 through 2011, overseeing protection of the Crow's cultural, archaeological and historic resources. The office hires monitors to oversee projects on tribal lands, such as new pipelines or transmission lines crossing the reservation.

Authorities said Old Horn arranged for companies including NorthWestern Energy and ConocoPhillips to make direct payments to the monitors — who included members of his family — instead of sending payments to the tribe's financial office. Some monitors also were paid as tribal employees, prosecutors said.

Among the sites monitored was a 2,000-year-old bison kill site that the U.S. attorney's office said was irreparably damaged after excavation work was approved by Old Horn in 2011.

Much of the money brought in through the scheme came from companies that were charged inflated rates for monitoring work, authorities said.

But defense attorneys successfully argued only the losses to the tribe should be considered under the charges that were filed, and that those were less than the government maintained.

In a Tuesday court filing, prosecutors acknowledged they missed the chance to seek more restitution.

"Had the United States been more expansive in its charging it could have drafted an indictment that charged one scheme, to defraud the tribe, and a second scheme, to defraud the companies," Assistant U.S. Attorney Carl Rostad wrote.

Failing to do so "has resulted in (the) Old Horn family's retention of the majority of the fraudulent proceeds," he added.

It appears unlikely that additional charges will be pursued, although Rostad said Friday that no final decision has been made.

Sentencing is scheduled for May 9 for the three remaining defendants in the case — Old Horn, his son, Allen and Shawn Talking Eagle Danforth. They were found guilty in August of conspiracy, mail fraud, theft from an organization receiving federal funds and theft from a tribal organization

Attorneys for the three either declined comment or did not immediately respond Friday.

Dale Old Horn's nephew is tribal chairman Darrin Old Coyote. During a February hearing, a representative of Old Coyote's administration minimized the tribe's damages in the scheme during testimony on behalf of the defendants.

Four other defendants previously pleaded guilty to reduced charges after reaching deals with prosecutors. Three were sentenced to five years of probation and ordered to pay a combined $146,000 in restitution, primarily to the tribe. Dale Old Horn's grandson, Martin Old Horn, was sentenced to six months in prison after pleading guilty to mail fraud and student aid fraud

Under Judge Watters' April 4 order, the three defendants found guilty at trial would not have to pay any restitution because judgments against those already sentenced would more than cover the tribe's losses.

The three also could benefit from shorter prison sentences. That's because sentencing guidelines are based in part on the amount of losses involved in a crime. Prosecutors have asked the judge to reconsider and make the seven defendants jointly liable. Watters has not yet responded to the request.

Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(2) Comments

  1. Roger
    Report Abuse
    Roger - April 26, 2014 7:53 am
    Wow! Allowing criminals to keep their ill-gotten money is irresponsible and wrong, period. It should not be allowed, and charges should have been filed against the crooks.
  2. Really_
    Report Abuse
    Really_ - April 25, 2014 5:44 pm
    wow - get to keep most of the money - sounds like an deputy assistant US attorney need to be fired or bump down to federal traffic court - good job Mr. Cotter
Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian ( may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Search our events calendar