BILLINGS – Authorities are considering whether to bring criminal charges against a 17-year-old who fired a bullet through his bedroom window here, killing his friend in a case an investigator has described as an accident.

The unidentified suspect had been startled when 15-year-old Mackeon Schulte and another friend knocked on his window early Sunday, Billings Police Capt. John Bedford said.

The alarmed teen grabbed a revolver, described as a family heirloom, and shot through the glass, striking Schulte in the head, Bedford said.

Police are investigating the shooting as a homicide, but it will be up to prosecutors to decide on charges. Bedford said the suspect was not considered a danger, and criminal charges could run the risk of "compounding a horrible situation."

"We're not going to rush to judgment," he said. "There's enough damage that's already been done."

Prosecutors are planning a lengthy review, Yellowstone County Attorney Scott Twito said.

Montana law recognizes three types of homicide – deliberate, mitigated and negligent – and all three will likely be options for prosecutors, Andrew King-Ries, associate dean at the University of Montana School of Law, said.

Deliberate homicide, or murder, comes into a play when someone knowingly causes another person's death, King-Ries said.

Mitigated homicide is when a person kills someone while under some kind of mental or emotional distress.

Negligent homicide applies when a person should be aware that their actions could cause a death but chooses to disregard that risk.

"When you shoot a gun, you're probably aware there's a risk," King-Ries said. "If you can establish negligence, it's not an accident."

Bedford said authorities were considering negligent homicide charges. "You don't necessarily have to have intent," he said. "Was this young man negligent in not identifying his target before firing the gun?"

Prosecutors have broad latitude on whether to file charges and can consider the wishes of the victim's family, who weren't available for comment Tuesday. But "there's going to have to be some kind of acknowledgment of what this young man did," Bedford said.

Prosecutors also will have to consider whether a defendant can claim a killing was justified under Montana's "castle doctrine" of self-defense.

That strategy was used unsuccessfully last year when a Missoula homeowner shot and killed a German exchange student.

Attorneys for defendant Markus Kaarma asserted the shooting was justified under the castle doctrine because the student was trespassing in their client's garage. Jurors rejected the argument, and Kaarma was sentenced to 70 years in state prison on a charge of deliberate homicide.

Both the victim and the suspect in the most recent case went to Billings Senior High School, where several classmates described them as good friends.

Freshman Betty Mitchell said the two were close and that the suspect's house had been broken into previously. He was probably scared when he heard noises outside his window, she said.

Neighbors described the suspect as friendly.

"He's a great kid, and it's a really nice family," said Emily Duncan, who lives next door. "We're just sad they're going through this."

More from missoulian.com

(9) comments

74griz

This 17 year old messed up big time. No different than if he got into a wreck and killed his friend. Dead is dead. A family is missing their son, and this "kid" has got to pay. How would you like to be the mother or father of the kid, yes KID, and see this 17 year old around town, time after time, just because the prosecutor declined to go after this case. Blaming the NRA or gun owners is stupidity.

MiddleFinger
MiddleFinger

This is the sad and predictable result when a kid's head is filled with an over-the-top pro gun message. Where there is no room for disagreement, there is no room for error. The shooter was taught--yes taught-- to go first for the gun regardless of the circumstances. Shooting from inside the house through a closed window is aggression fueled by delusion.

And this whole tragic mess by an irresponsible gun user will further degrade my second amendment rights. Until there is honest look at guns in America, the hard-core pro-gunners will keep killing the innocents, and the criminals will have no trouble arming themselves. Meanwhile the rest of us Americans will have to suffer.

The NRA sold this kid a bill of goods and will now drop him like a cheating senator for doing exactly what he was told to do...but not really supposed to do, of course.


Dick Summers

Well said MiddleFinger. -DS-

Roger
Roger

How do you supposedly know so much about the case? A pro-gun message made him do it? Americans have the right to own and carry firearms, whether you and little Dickie Summers like it or not.

"Self-defense can be an important crime deterrent".

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/cdc-study-use-firearms-self-defense-important-crime-deterrent

The number of US murders in 1991 was 24,700..

The number of US murders in 2013 was 14,196.

So, despite far more people owning guns, murders decreased drastically..

Guns don't cause crime - criminals cause crime.

http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm

Dick Summers

Yawn. Same old tone deaf (death?) comments from Roger et al. Again, a VERY narrow demographic offers up it's equally narrow comments under the banner of patriotism, where small thinkers huddle. Change is the only constant and the historically dominant demographic is on it's way out, bitter and narrow to the end. Dinosaurs. Do you suppose Roger there may be some middle ground between the story and what you regurgitated in your post? Fyi I own guns and I'm a disgruntled NRA life member. -DS-

Roger
Roger

@Dick Summers (below) - what's this "banner of patriotism" nonsense? I just provided you with some very pertinent facts, which you evidently choose to ignore. That's your problem.

BJackson

Very poorly stated Middlefinger

COMMON SENSE
COMMON SENSE

Seems to me I remember someone somewhere advocating shooting someone through the door with a shotgun...now who was that? Why yes, I do believe it was JOE BIDEN, our VICE PRESIDENT who is a LIBERAL! (and an idiot). Shooting an unknown person through an opaque door now how responsible is that? At least his predecessor Dick Cheyney had the stones to look a man in the eye before shooting him in the face with a shotgun! I wonder if the 'Biden told me to do it' defence will fly here? As for the NRA, any member of the NRA, if fact any person with two brain cells to rub together will tell you rule number one when it comes to firing a gun is CHECK YOUR TARGET! Don't point your weapon at someone or something you haven't positively identified or don't intend to shoot.

This was a tragic accident. The shooter believed he was in danger and was defending himself and his home. He is just a kid, he panicked and fired. the question should be weather or not he was old enough that his parents should have let him have easy access to a gun unsupervised. Had he known it was his friend just trying to get his attention this would not have happened.

Oh and by the way, you should be ashamed of yourself for using this tragic situation to advance your own personal agenda of branding all gun owners as murderers. You don't like our second amendment, STOP WHINING, MOVE TO MEXICO AND ENJOY THEIR ANTI-GUN SOCIETY!

Objective observer

Nice try. Biden was talking about someone trying to break down his door from the outside, not blindly shooting at an unknown target. And comparing that to Cheney's careless shooting of his hunting partner? Good God, THAT is conservative critical thinking for you which is far from common sense.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.