Ravalli County Commission approves natural resource policy

2012-11-08T23:45:00Z 2012-11-09T06:58:16Z Ravalli County Commission approves natural resource policyBy PERRY BACKUS Ravalli Republic missoulian.com
November 08, 2012 11:45 pm  • 

HAMILTON - Despite a last-minute appeal by critics asking for more time, the Ravalli County commissioners unanimously approved a natural resource policy Thursday morning.

The commission contends the policy will help guide the county in future dealings with public lands managers, including the U.S. Forest Service.

Much of the public comment Thursday came from citizens concerned that the county is overreaching with its new policy and that commissioners have not taken enough time to find the middle ground between different interest groups.

Newly elected commissioner Jeff Burrows told those in attendance the policy wasn’t something set in stone.

“We can come back and revisit this,” Burrows said. “It’s a living document and updates can be made.”

The policy was initially written by a group of citizens mostly concerned with the economic and environmental impacts of national forest management in and around the Bitterroot Valley.

Last spring, the group’s proposed natural resource plan was offered to the commission. In a series of public meetings that began in May, the commission went over the proposed policy sentence by sentence and made changes.

Over the past few weeks, the commission has considered an alternative policy written by a group of eight county residents who were especially concerned about the county’s position on “coordination.”

Commissioners point to federal environmental law they say opens the door for the county to have a special seat at the table under the term “coordination.”

At Thursday’s meeting, Kelsey Milner of Hamilton said that aspect of the county’s policy “smells like county supremacy and an assault on public lands.”

Russ Lawrence of Hamilton said he attended many of the meetings the commission held about the document. The chief change the commission made was to substitute the word “policy” for the word “plan,” he said.

The Bitterroot National Forest already has a land use plan, Lawrence said. And when it comes time to update that plan, the agency will have to consider impacts to not only local interests, but also how it will benefit 300 million other Americans, he said.

“The policy you are considering, I believe, is an overreach and a waste of your time and taxpayers' dollars,” Lawrence said.


Nancy Ballance of Hamilton helped write the original document. She said federal laws regulating management of public lands make it very clear that local governments should have a special role in coordinating with federal land management agencies.

While critics claim the commission isn’t filled with experts on timber management or hydrology, Ballance said the government does recognize that commissioners are experts on Ravalli County’s unique economic issues, customs and culture.

“They need to be able to protect that,” she said.

Commissioner Greg Chilcott said he wasn’t sure where the pushback was coming from on the issue.

“This is something that we will be able to bring to the table when decisions are going to be made,” Chilcott said. “This is a negotiation tool.”

Chilcott challenged anyone to show him where there was anything in the document that suggested the county was looking for supremacy over federal lands.

“It’s just not there,” he said.

Copyright 2015 missoulian.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(2) Comments

  1. mtmike
    Report Abuse
    mtmike - November 10, 2012 12:18 am
    I know you are chuckling Matt, but people are wising up to your scam. At some point bs will be called on your little non profit, obstructionist scam.

    At some point when you sue you will be required to put some bucks in the game you play..that will be the end of your con game.
  2. Matthew Koehler
    Report Abuse
    Matthew Koehler - November 09, 2012 12:04 pm
    “The policy you are considering, I believe, is an overreach and a waste of your time and taxpayers' dollars,” Lawrence said.

Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on Missoulian.com

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian (Missoulian.com) may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in Missoulian.com's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on missoulian.com.

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Search our events calendar