Remington facing at least 3 class-action lawsuits

2013-10-20T22:15:00Z 2014-07-11T15:17:41Z Remington facing at least 3 class-action lawsuitsMissoulian State Bureau
October 20, 2013 10:15 pm  • 

HELENA – The Remington Arms Co. has faced numerous lawsuits over alleged defects in its Model 700 bolt-action rifle – including at least three class-action lawsuits filed in federal courts in Montana, Washington and Missouri.

The class-action suits, all filed earlier this year on behalf of rifle owners, allege that “every Model 700 should be considered unreasonably dangerous and defective because it is prone to fire without pulling the trigger due to the defective design of the trigger assembly.”

The suits also accuse Remington of knowingly concealing the “defective nature” of the rifle, ask for damages, and ask that the company be ordered to notify all Model 700 owners of the problem.

However, none of the lawsuits has had the plaintiffs “certified” as a class – a key step in any successful class-action suit.

The Montana lawsuit was dismissed three weeks ago at the request of Remington and the plaintiffs. Lawyers in the case declined to discuss why they asked for dismissal.

Also this month, an Oregon woman severely injured by a Remington Model 700 rifle more than 30 years ago asked a federal judge in Oregon to re-open her case for a new trial.

Teri See alleged that before the 1983 trial on her original lawsuit against the company, Remington fraudulently concealed evidence about its knowledge of defects in the rifle. A jury ruled in favor of Remington at that trial.

Over the years, Remington has won, lost and settled scores of lawsuits filed by people injured by the Model 700 rifle. Most of the suits alleged the rifle has a defect that can cause it to fire without the trigger being pulled.

One of the biggest verdicts against Remington was in 1994. Texas oil worker Glenn Collins, whose foot was amputated after an accident with the Model 700, won a $17 million verdict against the company. The case later was settled out of court, after Remington agreed not to appeal the verdict.

Collins said the rifle fired accidentally in 1989 as he was unloading it, striking his foot.

Copyright 2015 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(4) Comments

  1. Roger
    Report Abuse
    Roger - October 21, 2013 3:21 pm
    Oh - the "children" argument - well, how many children are killed in motor vehicle accidents, compared to the number killed by Remington M700s with allegedly defective triggers?
  2. Still Here
    Report Abuse
    Still Here - October 21, 2013 9:07 am
    I hope you two have plenty of Remington Model 700's and enjoy playing with the trigger mechanism. People have lost lost their lives, Children have been lost, and you two clowns don't have a clue.
  3. Roger
    Report Abuse
    Roger - October 21, 2013 8:26 am
    This controversy enables people who "accidentally" shoot themselves or others to avoid responsibility for their unsafe gun handling, and possibly receive a settlement from Remington.
  4. johnny Dollar
    Report Abuse
    johnny Dollar - October 21, 2013 2:35 am
    No shortage of scumbag lawyers trying to shake down a company.....I think we might even have a few in this town.

    Here again.....we see a moron (Collins) shooting his foot. Why.....would you ever point a gun at your foot? I suppose we could ask the local officer (Undersheriff perhaps) ......that shot his foot. I can say for certain that this is why I hate hunting around other people and I am always a bit nervous at the gun range.

    Be safe ....especially during hunting season. The few people who get shot in Montana this season will most likely be shot by someone they know.
Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian ( may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Search our events calendar