Washington coal train study won't visit Montana cities

2013-08-01T21:45:00Z 2014-10-03T14:24:39Z Washington coal train study won't visit Montana cities missoulian.com

At this point, agencies considering the effects of coal train traffic in Montana due to a proposed port in Washington do not plan to visit cities in Montana as part of their review, according to the Washington Department of Ecology.

However, analysts plan to review existing studies of the impacts of rail traffic in Montana, and they also plan to scrutinize rail communities of representative sizes in Washington state, said Josh Baldi, regional director for the Washington Department of Ecology. On Thursday, Baldi also said the process is in its early stages and could change along the way as consultants develop methodologies.

Earlier this week, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Washington Department of Ecology and Whatcom County announced that their environmental assessment of the proposed coal export terminal in Cherry Point, Wash., would take impacts in Montana into account. Because of its scope, the draft environmental impact statement likely will take two years, according to the Department of Ecology.

“The fact is, this is a very large-scale, new export terminal that has far-reaching impacts,” Baldi said. “And so we believe that the environmental review is commensurate with potential impacts.”

If the Cherry Point terminal is built, the Northern Plains Research Council estimates it would result in up to 18 coal trains per day traveling through Washington, Montana and Idaho. The council, a conservation and agriculture group based in Billings, estimates it would be the largest facility in North America and export up to 48 million metric tons of coal per year to Asia.

Missoula City Councilman Dave Strohmaier has been among the community leaders calling for a thorough assessment of the impacts of increased traffic in Montana. In a news release from the council, he said coal exports “take a toll on our state’s health and infrastructure.”

“We won’t give up until we make sure our communities aren’t paying the costs of coal export,” Strohmaier said.

The Montana Coal Council could not be reached for comment late Thursday afternoon. However, the Montana Coal Council has earlier estimated that each coal train represents a contribution of $30,000 in state, federal and other taxes.

Reach Keila Szpaller at @keilaszpaller, at keila.szpaller@missoulian.com or at (406) 523-5262.

Copyright 2015 missoulian.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(1) Comments

  1. Deadwolf
    Report Abuse
    Deadwolf - August 02, 2013 7:09 am
    They know they won't find anything negative about the coal trains here. Many of our families, friends and neighbors have good paying jobs with MRL or BNSF. Why would they want to find evidence to support the idea of good jobs? Currently the coal is railed to Seattle, routed north to Canada and shipped to China from there. It is going to China regardless of what the "greenies" want. Why not build a facility in the USA and keep the jobs here? Oh, I know why.
Missoulian Civil Dialogue Policy

Civil Dialogue Policy for Commenting on Missoulian.com

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Comments can only be submitted by registered users. By posting comments on our site, you are agreeing to the following terms:

Commentary and photos submitted to the Missoulian (Missoulian.com) may be published or distributed in print, electronically or other forms. Opinions expressed in Missoulian.com's comments reflect the opinions of the author, and are not necessarily the opinions of the Missoulian or its parent company. See the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Our guidelines prohibit the solicitation of products or services, the impersonation of another site user, threatening or harassing postings and the use of vulgar, abusive, obscene or sexually oriented language, defamatory or illegal material. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other classification. It's fine to criticize ideas, but ad hominem attacks on other site users are prohibited. Users who violate those standards may lose their privileges on missoulian.com.

You may not post copyrighted material from another publication. (Link to it instead, using a headline or very brief excerpt.)

No short policy such as this can spell out all possible instances of material or behavior that we might deem to be a violation of our publishing standards, and we reserve the right to remove any material posted to the site.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Search our events calendar