In the Sept. 28 issue of the Missoulian I read that in a debate with Steve Bullock, governor want-to-be Rick Hill stated he was worried about the take-home pay of Montana workers.
This puzzles me because Rick Hill also stated that one of his first acts as Governor would be to sign into law “right to work” legislation. “Right to work” states, on average, have a lower take-home pay of 8 to 11 percent compared to non- “right to work” states. Benefits such as medical and retirement are also affected.
Who is Rick Hill trying to B.S.? Why would we want the right to work for less? Should Rick Hill be our next Governor? I vote no!
Steve Carey, Frenchtown