Recently, two reports have been released that tell very different stories about Montana’s energy future. One is optimistic, solutions-oriented and comes after a broad collaborative effort. The other was sponsored by industry and is unnecessarily pessimistic.
The first spells out Montana’s extraordinary opportunity to prosper in the inevitable transition to renewables. Released in late June by the Bonneville Power Administrator (BPA) and Gov. Steve Bullock, the Montana Renewables Development Action Plan resulted from an intensive six-month effort to overcome barriers to renewable resource development in Montana. The process involved 85 percent of the owners of Colstrip Units 3 and 4, all of the Colstrip transmission system owners, renewable developers, government agencies, conservation groups and energy and transmission experts. I was honored to actively participate.
The plan concluded, in part, that the valuable Colstrip transmission system can remain reliable while transmitting substantial levels of renewable energy to Northwest markets. So, when the Colstrip power plant units are retired, the transmission system can remain a superhighway for renewable resources, creating new jobs and tax revenue in the process.
This was among the most important and effective electricity planning projects in my 40-plus-year career. It squarely addressed the transmission and regional market barriers blocking the opportunity to develop our abundant renewable resources.
However, not everyone sees renewable energy as an opportunity. The other report, funded by the Montana Chamber of Commerce Foundation, paints a misleading doomsday view of the state’s economy. It is undermined by two fatally flawed assumptions that drive the gross overstatement of economic impacts: 1. it considers the retirement of Colstrip Units 3 and 4 before 2043 as “early” or unjustified; and 2. it assumes the only energy that would replace the 1,500 megawatts from Colstrip units 3 and 4 would be a paltry 220 megawatt natural gas plant. Both assumptions are simply unrealistic.
A reality check on the retirement of Colstrip Units 3 and 4
Colstrip 3 and 4 are 70 percent owned by four utilities serving Washington and Oregon, where customers are demanding less carbon pollution from their electricity and where they face in-state regulatory and legislative directives to transition away from coal between 2027-2030. Further, economic conditions, such as the rapid decline in the cost of renewables and natural gas, have placed serious market pressure on coal while the costs of mining and burning coal are rising as facilities age and environmental liabilities mount. This complex mix of economic conditions is also what drove the decisions to retire Colstrip Units 1 and 2 by mid-2022.
I deeply respect that uncertainty about coal jobs produces fear and anxiety in some communities, and while it may be theoretically possible to operate Colstrip Units 3 and 4 for another 25 years, it would take significant investments in maintenance and upgrades. Ultimately, retirement decisions will be based on the Colstrip owners’ assessments of economic conditions and future expectations. Such decisions will not be “early” in any economic sense and it is misleading and counterproductive to assign blame or calculate distorted economic impacts.
The path forward
The Northwest represents the best market opportunity for Montana’s competitively priced renewable resources. Montana and Colstrip workers should aggressively seize upon the opportunity to develop these resources. The Colstrip area has significant strengths, including a highly skilled workforce and a transmission system that provides an economic lifeline to Northwest markets. Combined with jobs and economic activity for plant decommissioning and reclamation of the lands that have been impacted for decades, renewable resource development can provide valuable economic development and jobs.
Montana’s energy future is bright — if we seize upon it!
More information about the Montana Renewables Development Action Plan can be found at www.bit.ly/mtrenewables.